KERAJAAN MALAYA & MALAYSIA BERBEZA

1.Kerajaan malaya dan malaysia itu berbeza... malaya wujud dari 1957 hingga 1963 manakalan malaysia wujud dari 1963 hingga lah sekarang.... 

Anda perlu faham tuu.... kalo anda mahu menyatakan malaya jahat dan dajal jadi ini beerti sabah dan Sarawak juga jahat dan dajal sebab mempersetujui perseketuan malaysia.... dan kalo anda menyalahkan 100 % orang di malaya bagaimana pula dengan taib ?

Dia dilahirkan di miri sarawak,keturunan malanau dan sememangnya orang sarawak... dia memerintah sarawak hampir 30 tahun iaitu lebih lama dari pemerintahan Mahathir.... dan dalam 30 tahun cuba lihat apa kemajuan yang dibawa taib pada sarawak....? taib bukan orang malaya jadi anda cuba lah fikir sendiri walaupon sarawak merdeka tapi jika sarawak dipimpin oleh orang seperti taib pasti sarawak tidak akan maju...

2.ada dokumen atau perjanjian yang mengatakan setiap keputusan yang ingin dibuat oleh TAR perlu mendapat kan persetujuan dari sabah dan sarawak ? kalau ada sila tunjukan pada saya.... setiap negara atau pertubuhan mestilah mempunyai 1 ketua dan selalunya ketua mempunyai hak mutlak dalam membuat keputusan terutama ketika darurat.... 

anda perlu faham malaysia ketika itu sedang darurat... selatan malaya dan singapore berlaku rusuhan kaum dan politik , di utara malaya berlaku ancaman komunis, di borneo berlaku ancaman dari filipina dan indonesia dan TAR pula sedang sakit dan dirawat di london... anda fikir mudah bagi TAR untuk mendapatkan persetujuan dari semua pihak ?

boleh dikatakan semua pihak tidak bersetuju dalam pemisahan s'pore tapi apa boleh buat... ini saja cara yang ada.... malah ketika itu pemimpin sabah dan sarawak tidak membantah atau mempersoalkanya... jadi apa bukti sabah dan sarawak membantah tindakan ini ? yang membantahnya adalah pemimpin atau rakyat sarawak ? kenapa baru sekarang kalian mahu mempersoalkanya...?

3.saya tidak dilahirkan di tahun 1963 jadi say tak tahu keadaan sebenarnya tapi saya belajar dari buku dan cikgu saya... setahu saya sejak awal penubuhan Malaysia, sabah dan sarawak telah dianggap sebagai negari jadi kenapa tidak berlaku penentangan dari pemimpin dan rakyat sarawak ketika itu ? why now u want to rebels ??? untuk pengatahuan anda semua negeri di malaya juga merdeka dan berdaulat.... mereka boleh memilih untuk menyertai malaya atau tidak.... walaupon penang dan melaka 100 % masih dijajah, namun mereka dijanjikan kemerdekaan oleh british dengan menyertai malaya.... samalah seperti sabah dan sarawak... 

kalo borneo tidak menyertai malaysia pasti sabah dan sarawak tidak akan merdeka.... lihat saja brunai mereka tidak mahu menyertai malaysia dan akhirnya mereka merdeka lewat iaitu sekitar tahun 1980.... miri dan kota kinabalu hanya setaraf daerah atau wilayah dan mereka bukan setaraf negeri sebab miri tidak merdeka dan berdaulat... mereka hanya setaraf daerah kerana meraka hanya lah jajahan kingdom of sarawak ketika pemerintahan james brooke... 

negeri itu maksudnya mereka mempunyai kerajaan sendiri,berdaulat dan merdeka.negeri juga boleh memilih untuk membuat negara sendiri atau untuk bergabung dengan negeri lain... contoh negeri ialah manakala daerah atau wilayah boleh dikatatakan sebagai jajahan. Daerah tidak merdeka dan berdaulat.mereka tidak boleh pilih untuk membuat negara sendiri atau tidak.. mereka tidak pernah mempunyai kerajaan sendiri...

kerana itulah kuala lumpur tidak dipanggil negeri kerana wereka hanya wilayah perseketuan... contoh daerah ialah miri,kota kinabalu,kauntan kuala kangsar. jadi miri dan kota kinabalu tidak boleh dianggap negeri kerana mereka tidak pernah merdeka atau membuat kerajaan sendiri dan miri tidak pernah diberi pilihan sama untuk menyertai sarawak atau tidak... kerana miri hanya jajahan... andaian saya semuanya berdasarkan sejarah... kalo adalah salah sila betulkan dengan bukti dan hujahanya sekali... kelantan juga asalnya negara merdeka... tapi mereka mendapat status negeri apabila menyertai malaya.... perseketuan malaysia adalah kesinambungan dari perseketuan malaya... 

slepas terbentuknya perseketuan malaysia, perseketuan malaya telah pon dimansuhkan jadi tidak wujud lagi negara bernama malaya... malah west malaysia sekarang selalu dipanggil semenanjung malaysia dan bukanya malaya kerana perseketuan malaya itu sudah dihapuskan... dengan ini negeri seperti perak dan kelantan akan setaraf dengan sabah dan sarawak... dan pemimpin sabah dan sarawak tidak pernah mempersoalknya.... jadi rasanya tidak menjadi masalah.... saya ingin bertanya... anda mahu sabah dan sarawak merdeka dari malaysia hanya kerana tidak mahu borneo sataraf negeri atau kerana merasakan sabah dan sarawak ditindas kerajaan?


My answer to this question...

1. Malaysia Agreement 1963 is no longer valid due to Singapore been kicked out from Malaysia Formation

2. Both Sabah and Sarawak were being suppressed by Malaya government for 49 years in all aspects.

3. You are wrong when you said Malaya exist from 1957 until 1963 because the agreement of Malaysia 1963 shows that four countries forming Malaysia. From that agreement, it NEVER MENTION THAT SABAH AND SARAWAK ARE EQUAL PARTNER WITH THE state IN MALAYA. IT ONLY MENTION THAT SABAH SARAWAK WERE EQUAL PARTNER WITH MALAYA (all the state in malaya~ 11 state.)

4. IT DOES MENTION THAT ANY AGREEMENT, IT MUST HAVE AT LEAST 3/4 VOTE AMONG THE FOUR COUNTRIES. BUT THE DECISION MADE BY TAR WERE NEVER GET APPROVAL FROM THE LEADER OF SABAH AND SARAWAK. THE LEADER OF BOTH COUNTRY ONLY BEEN INFORMED AFTER MALAYA KICKED SINGAPORE AND OUR LEADER WERE SO ANGRY BY THIS ACTION! NEVER EVER GET ANY NOTICE BEFORE THE ACTION!

‎5. Please refer to the Original Malaysia Agreement 1963 which stated that, each country must manage their own except the certain part that the leader already agree. Sabah and Sarawak have 20 and 18 points that Malaya MUST RESPECT! But for 49 years, they never ever respect it and they trying so hard to vanish it.

6. WE DID NOT REBEL BUT WE CLAIMED OUR RIGHTS AS AN EQUAL PARTNER! BUT WHAT HAPPENED BACK THEN, MALAYA DID SOMETHING THAT SABAHAN PEOPLE WILL NEVER EVER FORGIVE... DOUBLE SIX TRAGEDY! AND THE FIRST CHIEF MINISTER OF SARAWAK WAS SACKED BY MALAYA DUE TO TRYING TO SECEDE FROM THIS FORMATION. SABAH AND SARAWAK HAVE THE RIGHTS TO SECEDE BECAUSE THE AGREEMENT 1963 IS INVALID AND NULLIFIED.

7. Your History Teacher taught you the wrong history. They trying to hide the fact so that the people of Sabah and Sarawak will never ever know and learn about what is happening in the past. We cannot except what malayan teacher taught us even our educated history teacher also teach the wrong history. I want to ask you, did you ever heard about 18 and 20 points of Sabah and Sarawak.... Will you tell me what is the content of that agreement?

8. All states in Malaya were colonized by British! They only have one independence day~ 31 AUGUST 1957. They are not Independence state before 1957! Get your fact correct!

‎9. Our history is different! Pahang, perlis and all the eleven area were called state which is Sabah we just call them as District. All the eleven states are just equal to our district in Sabah and Sarawak such as Kota Kinabalu, Sandakan, Kuching, Miri and many more... Look at the size of the area. Your teacher teach you to believe in that way.... I won't blame you for that... But we Sabahan and Sarawakian people do not look in that way... Your History teacher that were sent to Sabah and Sarawak trying to brainwash our generation mind to believe is such history. But they cannot fool us who know the real history.

‎10. One more thing, SABAH AND SARAWAK NEVER EVER JOIN MALAYSIA!!! By saying that we join Malaysia... That would mean "Malaysia" is already exist... Please get yourselves do the real research... But don't read or search the Malaysia History made by Malaya... SABAH AND SARAWAK TOGETHER WITH SINGAPORE AND MALAYA FORMED "MALAYSIA". "MALAYSIA" WERE NAMED BY SABAH AND SARAWAK. IT'S ALL NOTED IN 18 & 20 POINTS OF AGREEMENT 1963. YOUR GOVERNMENT WANT THE FORMATION TO BE NAME "MELAYU RAYA" BUT WE OBJECT IT! DID YOU GET IT???!

by : Trulysabahan.

Read More

SARAWAK MUSEUM AT KUCHING CITY-NORTH. SARAWAK.

SARAWAK MUSEUM AT KUCHING CITY-

NORTH.  SARAWAK.

Read More

GOD BLESS THE KINGDOM OF SARAWAK. DUM SPERO SPIRO
 It means "while I hope, I breathe"; it's usually phrased the other way around: "dum spiro, spero", "while I breathe, I hope"

Read More

KOTOBIAN DO TADAU TAGGAZO DO KAAMATAN

KOTOBIAN DO TADAU TAGGAZO DO KAAMATAN
HAPPY HARVEST FESTIVAL IN SABAH ON 31ST MAY , 2012.

✿  ✿  ✿ ✿  ✿✿  ✿  ✿ ✿  ✿✿  ✿  ✿ ✿  ✿

THEY ARE OUR FUTURE GENERATIONS WHO ARE STILL KEEP OUR NORTH BORNEON CULTURE. BE BLESSED TO ALL SABAHANS  CHILDREN.

Read More

KOTA -KINABALU, SABAH
THROW UP MILK BY 100 PUPILS !!??

Who is more responsible ???............These children could be one from our families...........

Read More

MIXED MARRIAGES WILL CAUSED PROBLEMS

MIXED MARRIAGES WILL CAUSED PROBLEMS ....

Sources from :http://www.theborneopost.com/2012/05/19/kahwin-campur-sering-cetus-masalah-status-bumiputera/ -

(Mixed marriages always causing problems for status of "Bumiputera" [ Indigenous ])

Kahwin campur sering cetus masalah status Bumiputera – BorneoPost Online | Borneo , Malaysia, Sarawak

KUCHING: Perkahwinan campur dalam kalangan masyarakat Sarawak khasnya menimbulkan masalah kepada anak yang dilahirkan tanpa status Bumiputera.

KUCHING: Perkahwinan campur dalam kalangan masyarakat Sarawak khasnya menimbulkan masalah kepada anak yang dilahirkan tanpa status Bumiputera.Perkara itu disuarakan ADUN Meluan Wong Judat dalam perbahasan usul terima kasih terhadap ucapan Yang di-Pertua Negeri pada persidangan Dewan Undangan Negeri (DUN), semalam. Beliau memberitahu timbul masalah bagi golongan wanita bangsa lain yang mengahwini lelaki berbangsa lain seperti Cina.

“Ini kerana anak yang dilahirkan nanti tidak berstatus Bumiputera dan keadaan ini berlaku di kawasan saya (Meluan).

✬.*`,✳.*`,✬.,●♥●✬.*`,✳.*`,,✬.*`,✳.*`,,✬●♥●.*`,✳.✬●♥●.*`,✳.*`,✬.,✬.*`,✳.

By reading the above news, it is well known as only the existing government ways of governing the country by divided and rules. Ethnicity is one special word and status for Sabah and Sarawak Nations. These is also shown that Malaysian Government have put their people to so called High Class and Lower Class according to races , ethnicity and religions.

The fact has been found in world researches about "The Benefits of Mixed Marriages" are :-

Other benefits of mixed marriages would be that the child would learn more tolerance and respect towards all races. Such children may be open to new ideas, and less hostile regarding one's religious creed or nationality. Many wars are fought over both religion and patriotic fanaticism, and a child of mixed background is not going to really purely identify with either one of the other racial background, thus, the child is less susceptible to being nationalistic to a fanatical degree.

Read More

TANYA ANGIN KENAPA POKOK BERGOYANG ?

Menurutnya kejayaan negara mencapai kemerdekaan dan membentuk Persekutuan Malaysia pada 16 September 1963 telah dicemburui banyak pihak sehingga ada yang beria-ia hendak menidakkannya dengan pelbagai gelagat yang berniat jahat dan tohmahan yang tidak berasas."Justeru itu, kita hendaklah memastikan segala kesejahteraan hidup dan kemakmuran yang telah kita capai itu tidak dirosakkan oleh golongan tertentu yang tidak bertanggungjawab itu.

"Demi menjamin kestabilan dan ketahanan politik, sosial dan ekonomi negara ini, kita harus menolak segala bentuk anasir dan tindak-tanduk melampau yang sengaja dicetuskan oleh sesetengah pihak yang cemburu akan keharmonian rakyat pelbagai keturunan dan kepesatan pembangunan yang telah dilaksana oleh kerajaan sejak negara kita mencapai kemerdekaan," katanya.

sumber dari :http://sabahkini.net/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=12633%3Abelajar-dari-hikayat-tiga-negara&catid=37%3Apolitik&Itemid=41 

                                                

Sabah mahu merdeka dari British bukan untuk dihisap hasilnya oleh Malaya. Tiada lagi kompromi, hancurkan hegemoni arogan (kesombongan keangkuhan kecongkakan) Malaya di Sabah!

“Jika Tiga Negara boleh ditubuhkan menjadi Malaysia, tiada sebab tidak boleh dibubarkan!” - Naspazi

                                                             

Read More

DO YOU ALL KNOW WHAT IS THE TRUTH IN MALAYSIAN AGREEMENT ?

source :http://northborneoindependence.blogspot.com/2012/05/before-and-after.html

Read More

Sabah High Court: "Negara"

SABAH HIGH COURT : The stone for Sabah High Court are clear stated, Sabah is "Negara" ; which is a Nation instead of a State.

This title, from Nation  are been downgraded to State since Sabah  formed Malaysia in 1963.

Read More

Malaysia's first and oldest state legislative assembly meeting place

BINTULU

The site marked the place where Malaysia's first and oldest state legislative assembly meeting took place on 8th September, 1867. With Charles Brooke, the second white Rajah of Sarawak in the chair, there sat 5 of his British Officers and 16 Malay and Melanau Members (Chiefs) to mark a new era in the conduct of the affairs of the state. A centenary stone commemorating the centennial of the historical meeting was erected on this site in 1967 and was further improved to include a clock tower and fountain in 1987, the fountain was attractively fenced up in November 1998 for safety and aesthetically purpose.

Read More

GLOBAL DEFENCE, AEROSPACE AND SECURITY, BAE SYSTEM RATES SABAH

Read More

Educations in Sarawak under 18 Points Agreement

Bian said dispite 50 years independence, Sarawak has little to celebrate in relation to its ties with the Federation of Malaysia. He said the rights of Sarawak has stated in the 18-Points Agreement have been "slowly and insidiously eroded without anyone realizing it. In this regard, it is time we take heed of what is rightfully ours". He said drawing attention to several points under the 18-Points for the state government to look into.

Read More

S’wak must take ownership of education | Free Malaysia Today

“Even the Education Minister (Muhyiddin Yassin) is not sure exactly how good or bad the educational system is. “In April, he was reported to have claimed that Malaysia’s education is ‘one of the best in the world and that it is better than that being provided in the United States, Germany and also the United Kingdom’.

“However, in (last) Sunday’s papers, he was reported to have said that the government’s 10 to 15-year target to achieve an education system on par with, or better than those of developed countries, was realistic.

Bian said despite 50 years of independence, Sarawak had little to celebrate in relation to its ties with the Federation of Malaysia. He said the rights of Sarawak as stated in the 18-points agreement have been “slowly and insidiously eroded without anyone realizing it. “In this regard it is time we take heed of what is rightfully ours,” he said drawing attention to several points under the 18-Points Agreement for the state government to look into.

Source  : http://www.freemalaysiatoday.com/category/nation/2012/05/17/swak-must-take-ownership-of-education/

Read More

SAFODA (Sabah Forest Depaartment) rampas tanah kami!!!

This is our only Home and our only Land. Please give back to us, the people of Sabah Native.

(Inilah sahaja RUMAH kami, TANAH kami. Berikan kembali hak milik kami sebagai Anak Pribumi Sabah )

Read More

Musa Aman (Sabah Chief Minister) and Taib Mahmud (Sarawak Chief Minister)

What do they ever care about Sabah and Sarawak, respectively ? This 2 Nations of people are struggling ; till  we are on the poorest land. This is supposed to be democracy but we are not treated as in democracy government. Our daily life are being torture, specially people of interior places. Mentally torture have been going on for years in Sabah and Sarawak. No equality and human rights protected.

Read More

To know Penan tribe in Sarawak

Traditional Penan society is nomadic and survives by hunting and gathering. Only a handful of such societies remain on earth. The nomadic hunting-gathering lifestyle represents the original human condition, and was the way our own ancestors lived for millions of years.

Until a few decades ago, thousands of Penan wandered through the forests of Borneo's interior. Today, only a small number of them continue to practice this ancient lifestyle. Yet while most Penan now have permanent homes by the riversides, they continue to make long journeys into the forest to collect food, medicine, and other jungle products. The physical and spiritual well-being of all Penan, whether nomadic or settled, depends on the survival of the forest.

The Penan, like other nomadic hunter-gatherers, enjoy an egalitarian society. There are no social classes or hierarchies. There is no wealth or poverty, and all food is shared. Each band has a headman who acts as a spokesperson but wields no power. Although certain tasks are reserved for men and others for women, there is no obvious sexual inequality, and neither sex exercises coercion over the other. Both men and women are gentle and soft-spoken. Outsiders who observe them are invariably struck by the complete absence of violence among the Penan.

Read More

Early History of North Borneo

Not much is known of Sabah's early prehistory. Archeological finds are rare but it must be presumed that as early as 40,000 years ago modern man has already roamed the jungles of North Borneo.


By the 9th century AD., Sabah, then under various chieftains, traded with China and later the Spanish and Portuguese. During the 15th century, 

Sabah was a vassal of the Sultan of Brunei. In 1521, Ferdinand Magellan’s ships sailed into Brunei Bay and later repaired their vessels in Banggi and Balambangan islands in the very north of Sabah. In 1704, the Sultan of Brunei ceded the lands east of Marudu Bay to the Sultan of Sulu, while the west coast remained under his rule.

The Sultans of Brunei and Sulu exercised a nominal control over north Borneo, especially the coasts, while headhunters roamed the forests and pirates infested the seas. The headhunters were Kadazandusun, as well as Murut tribesmen, and of the two the Kadazandusun were the first to give up headhunting. The pirates were Illanun, Iranum, Balanini, Obian, Bajau and Suluk living in the Southern Philippines and on islands off the coast of North Borneo. Their vessels were of large size, mostly out-triggered, measuring approximately ninety feet long and heavily armed. In Sabah, their strongest lairs were in Marudu Bay and the Tunku Island near present day Kota Kinabalu.

In 1685 the first Englishman visited Sabah. It was Captain Cowley, and he visited the islands on the northern end of Borneo (Banggi, Balambangan). 

In the 1760’s Alexander Dalrymple and James Rennell came to Borneo and mentioned Sabah.

In 1773 the East India Company founded a trading post on Balambangan Island, but two years later the settlement was attacked and destroyed by pirates. 

It was not until Raja Brooke of Sarawak, with his personal contacts to the Sultan of Brunei, persuaded the Government to suppress piracy and in 1846 the Sultan of Brunei ceded Labuan Island off Sabah's south-west coast to serve as a base for the anti-piracy operations of the British. The last pirate stronghold in Sabah, at Tunku Islands, was destroyed in 1879.

Read More

Sino - Kadazan.

From Late Latin Sinae (“‘the Chinese’”), from Ancient Greek Σινάι, from Arabic الصين (aʂ-ʂīn), “‘China, the Chinese’”), from Mandarin اط (qيn) in اط³¯ (qيn chلo), “‘Chin Dynasty’”).

Sino-

1. A combining form relating to China or the Chinese.

In the 1970s, Sino-Soviet rivalry also spread to Africa and the Middle East.

He's a Sino-Kadazan: half Chinese, half Kadazan.

The Kadazans are an ethnic group indigenous to the state of Sabah in Malaysia. They are found mainly on the west coast of Sabah, the surrounding locales, and various locations in the interior. Due to similarities in culture and language with the Dusun ethnic group, and also because of other political initiatives, a new unified term called "Kadazan-dusun" was created. Collectively, they form largest ethnic group Sabah.

While Kadazan was an official designation for this ethnic group, it is widely believed that the term itself was a political derivative that came into existence in the late 1950s to early 1960s. No proper historical record exists pertaining to the origins of the term or its originator. However, an article written by Richard Tunggolou[1] on this matter may shed some light.

According to Mr. Tunggolou, most of the explanations of the meanings and origins of the word ‘Kadazan’ assumed that the word was of recent origin, specifically in the late 1950’s and early 1960’s. He says that some people have theorized that the term originates from the word ‘kakadazan’ (towns) or ‘kedai’ (shops), and from the claim that Kadazan politicians such as the late Datuk Peter J. Mojuntin coined the term. In fact, the word ‘Kadazan’ is not of recent origin. There was evidence that the term has been used long before the 1950s. Owen Rutter, in his book, “The Pagans Of North Borneo”, published in 1929, wrote: “The Dusun usually describes himself generically as a tulun tindal (landsman) or, on the West Coast, particularly at Papar, as a Kadazan.” (page 31). Owen Rutter worked in Sabah for five years as District Officer in all five residencies and left Sabah with the onset of the First World War. 

This means that he started working in Sabah from 1910 and left Sabah in 1914. We can therefore safely say that the word ‘Kadazan’ was already in existence before any towns or shops were built in the Penampang district and that Kadazan politicians did not invent the word in the late fifties and early sixties.

Read More