Sabah dan Sarawak adalah BERSTATUS NEGARA dan bukannya Negeri.

Sabah dan Sarawak adalah sebuah Negara yang MERDEKA DAN BERDAULAT yang mana kedua - dua NEGARA ini telah bersama-sama dengan Singapura dan Malaya untuk membentuk Persekutuan Malaysia pada 16 September 1963.

Happy Sabah (North Borneo) Independence Day 51 Years

Sabah or previously known as North Borneo was gained Independence Day from British on August 31, 1963. To all Sabahan, do celebrate Sabah Merdeka Day with all of your heart!

Sarawak For Sarawakian!

Sarawak stand for Sarawak! Sarawakian First. Second malaysian!

The Unity of Sabah and Sarawak

Sabah dan Sarawak adalah Negara yang Merdeka dan Berdaulat. Negara Sabah telah mencapai kemerdekaan pada 31 Ogos 1963 manakala Negara Sarawak pada 22 Julai 1963. Sabah dan Sarawak BUKAN negeri dalam Malaysia! Dan Malaysia bukan Malaya tapi adalah Persekutuan oleh tiga buah negara setelah Singapura dikeluarkan daripada persekutuan Malaysia.

Sign Petition to collect 300,000 signatures

To all Sabahan and Sarawakian... We urge you to sign the petition so that we can bring this petition to United Nations to claim our rights back as an Independence and Sovereign Country for we are the Nations that live with DIGNITY!

Decedent of Rajah Charles Brooke

Jason Desmond Anthony Brooke. The Grandson of Rajah Muda Anthony Brooke, and Great Great Grandson of Rajah Charles Brooke

A true Independence is a MUST in Borneo For Sabah and Sarawak.

Sabah (formerly known as North Borneo) and Sarawak MUST gain back its Freedom through a REAL Independence.

Wednesday, 29 July 2015

Chronology of Sarawak throughout the Brooke Era to Malaysia Day

1835 Beginning of the Sarawak Rebellion (against the Sultan of Brunei) led by Sarawak chief Datu Patinggi Ali.

1839 James Brooke arrives in Kuching on the Royalist carrying a message of thanks and presents from the Governor of Singapore to Rajah Muda Hassim in Sarawak.

He returns later and at the request of the Rajah Muda Hassim, the Sultan of Brunei, suppresses the rebellion.

Sept 21 1841 Brooke made rajah and governor of Sarawak after Rajah Muda Hassim dismisses Makota.

1845 The battle of Marudu Bay sees Brooke enlisting the help of the British Royal Navy in Singapore to defeat Sherif Osman, a famous pirate leader from North Borneo, effectively ending his piracy.

1846 Sultan of Brunei unhappy with the English and Brooke.

His fi rst move against Brooke is to order the killing of Englishmen and everybody in Brunei close to him, which includes Rajah Muda Hassim, his brother Badruddin and other leaders in Brunei.

Brooke attacks Brunei in retaliation. Assisted by the British navy, they capture the city.

The Sultan is allowed to return to his palace after surrendering.

In addition he gives Sarawak completely to Brooke and his heirs forever without payment of any more money.

In memory of Rajah Muda Hassim and Badruddin, he gives two streets in Kuching their names: Jalan Muda Hassim and Badruddin Road. Later, two of his nephews, James and Charles Johnson come to Sarawak to help him.

James is given the title Tuan Besar and later, Rajah Muda.

Charles Johnson is called the Tuan Muda and changes his name to Charles Brooke later when he becomes the second rajah of Sarawak.

1849 The Battle of Beting Maru sees Brooke defeating Iban pirate chief named Linggir.

He is helped by Captain Farquhar, his ships of the Royal Navy and by Malay and Dayak in prahus.

Altogether there are about 75 boats and 3,500 men on Brooke’s side.

After a hard fight for several hours in the darkness, many pirate ships are sunk and hundreds of pirates killed or captured.

Brooke builds forts at Lingga and the mouth of the Skrang River on Batang Lupar to prevent more attacks.

1850 The US recognises Sarawak.

1852 Sarawak’s territory expands.

1853 Sarawak extended to the Krian River.

1855 Brooke starts the Supreme Council made up of a small group of important officers in Sarawak to help him govern the country.

1857 Kuching sacked by Chinese rebels.

Six hundred Chinese miners from Bau sail down the Sarawak river at night to attack the Astana, the government buildings and the fort. Much of Kuching is razed to the ground except for the Chinese areas.

Brooke retaliates by enlisting the help of loyal Malays.

Charles sails quickly from Lingga with Iban soldiers.

The rebels retreat up river and are chased to Bau and to the Dutch Borneo border where they try to escape to Sambas and Pontianak.

As many as 1,000 Chinese rebels and their families are killed.

1861 After their defeat at sea, pirates move farther inland to continue attacking villages and capturing heads.

The chief leader is an Iban named Libau, better known as Rentap.

From his Bukit Sadok fort, he leads his men to attack villages or the Rajah’s forts along the Batang Lupar.

After two unsuccessful counter-attacks, Charles becomes more determined to capture Rentap’s fort at Bukit Sadok.

He builds a twelve-pounder cannon in Kuching which takes 500 of his men to pull through the jungle to Bukit Sadok. Once there, 60 of his strongest men lift the cannon on poles and carry it to the top of Bukit Sadok 3,000 feet high.

The cannon fi re penetrates Rentap’s sturdy fort made of thick belian wood.

They discover, however, that the pirate leader has run off into the jungle and burn his fort.

Rentap is never to be heard of again.

1861 Sarawak is extended to Kidurong Point.

An offer by King Leopold I. of Belgium to purchase Sarawak is not successful.

1862 The Sarawak regiment.

Is created.

1863 Sarawak Dollar introduced.

1864 Britain recognises Sarawak as an independent principality.

1865 Charles forms the Council Negri which include people in the Supreme Council, other officers of the rajah’s government and the most important native chiefs.

1867 Council Negri holds its first meeting in Sibu.

1868 James Brooke is succeeded by his nephew Charles.

Brooke returns to England due to ill health and dies there.

1869 Sarawak begins issuing postage stamps.

1870 Sarawak Gazette begins publication.

1872 The name of the town of ‘Sarawak’ is changed to Kuching where it reportedly gets its name from a small brook which ran into the Sarawak River near the present Chinese Chamber of Commerce Building at the end of Main Bazaar.

1883 Sarawak extended to Baram River.

1884 Great fi re of Kuching. 1885 Acquisition of the Limbang area, from Brunei.

1888 Sarawak declared a British protectorate.

1890 Limbang added to Sarawak.

1891 Opening of the Sarawak Museum.

The border between Sarawak and Dutch Borneo is decided at a meeting between Great Britain and the Netherlands (Holland) whereupon it is decided that the border would follow as closely as possible the line of the highest mountains between Sarawak and Dutch Borneo.

1901 Sarawak’s population is 320,000 1903. Oil discovered in Sarawak.

1905 Acquisition of the Lawas Region, from Brunei.

Sarawak spans 47,000 square miles.

1912 Brooke Dry Dock opened. 1915 First railway line in Sarawak opened.

1915 Committee of Administration, seated in Kuching, established.

A 10-mile railway going south from Kuching fi rst used.

1917 Charles Vyner Brooke succeeds his father Charles as Rajah.

1924 Sarawak Penal Code introduced.

1925 Chartered Bank of India, Australia and China builds its first offi ce in Kuching to take care of the payment for Sarawak;s increasing business with other countries. 1931 Penghulu Asun leads a small rebellion among the Ibans against the government in the headwaters of the Kanowit, Entabai and Julau Rivers.

Vyner Brooke sends a police expedition up the Kanowit River and captures Asun and most of the other leaders.

Fort Brooke is built at Nanga Meluan on the Kanowit River.

Asun dies of old age in 1958. 1938 Kuching airport opened.

1941 Written constitution granted.

1941 Sarawak has a population of 490,000.

Dec 161941 Japanese occupy Miri.

Dec 19 1941 Japanese bomb Kuching.

Dec 24 1941 Japanese attack and capture Kuching.

1942-1945 Japanese occupation.

August 14 1945 Japanese surrender.

Sept 11 1945 Australian forces liberate Sarawak.

1945-1946 Sarawak is put under Australia’s military administration.

May 1946 Council Negri meets to talk about cession to British government.

They agree that Sarawak should become a colony by a vote of 19 to 16.

July 1 1946 Government passes a law that accepts Sarawak as a British Crown Colony.

1946 Sarawak becomes British crown colony.

1949 Governor Duncan Stewart is assassinated.

1957 Sarawak gets a new constitution which changes the size and powers of the Council Negri.

Council Negri is increased to 45 members.

1959 First general election held in Sarawak.

1961 May 27 Tunku Abdul Rahman, Prime Minister of Persekutuan Tanah Melayu, at a Foreign Correspondents’ Association of Southeast Asia press conference in Singapore, says the Federation of Malaya should have a close understanding with Britain and the people of Sarawak, Brunei and Sabah.

June 20 Sir Harold Macmillan, British Prime Minister, in a reply to a question in Parliament, says he is interested in the suggestion made by Tunku.

June 26 British offi cers from Singapore, Sarawak, Brunei and Sabah, consisting of governors, hold a meeting in Singapore until June 27.

July 1 Tunku Abdul Rahman accompanies the Yang Di- Pertuan Agong of Malaya to offi cially visit Brunei and Sarawak. July 9 Azahari (Partai Rakyat Brunei), Ong Kee Hui (Sarawak United People’s Party) and Donald Stephens (Sabah) establish the United Front and disagrees with the proposal by Tunku Abdul Rahman and Britain.

July 12 Tunku Abdul Rahman exposes communist threats in South East Asia as an important factor in his proposal.

July 22 Lee Kuan Yew, Singapore chief minister, proposes that representatives from Sarawak, Brunei and Sabah present their views at the Commonwealth Parliamentary Association (CPA) on the Malaysia proposal.

July 28 Establishment of the Malaysia Solidarity Consultative Committee (MSCC) in Singapore during the CPA Conference.

August 12 First visit of leaders from Sarawak and Sabah – Datu Bandar Abang Mustapa, Temenggong Jugah, Donald Stephens and Dato Mustapha – to Malaya to see the progress for themselves.

Many such visits are organised for leaders in Sarawak and Sabah up till the formation of Malaysia.

August 24 MSCC holds its fi rst meeting in Jesselton (now Kota Kinabalu) in North Borneo (Sabah).

Brunei did not attend.

October 16 A motion for the formation of Malaysia is tabled in Parliament by Tunku Abdul Rahman and is approved.

November 23 Malaya negotiates with Britain to amend the Defence Agreement to expand British assistance when Malaysia is formed and to maintain their army camps.

Malaya and Britain negotiate and agree on the setting up of an investigative commission on the formation of Malaysia.

December Parti Barisan Anak Jati Sarawak (Barjasa) is registered.

Political parties formed earlier are the Sarawak United People’s Party (SUPP) on 12 June 1959, Parti Negara Sarawak (Panas) on 9 April 1960 and Sarawak National Party (SNAP) on 10 April 1961.

These older parties are formed for local council and district elections that started in 1959.

December 18 MSCC holds its second meeting in Kuching.

Brunei attends only as observer.

December 20 The stand of Sarawak and Sabah shifts from opposition to bargaining on issues such as representation in parliament, freedom of religion, national language, civil service, immigration and economic development as stated in a press statement at the end of the MSCC meeting.

December 30 During a conference in Jakarta, Partai Komunis Indonesia (PKI), the third largest communist party in the world, condemns the formation of Malaysia as a British neo-colonist ploy.

1962 January 4 British colonial government in Sarawak publishes a white paper on Sarawak’s consent for Malaysia and the establishment of an investigative commission proposed by the governments of Malaya and Britain on November 23, 1961.

The White Paper is translated into local dialects and widely distributed in Sarawak.

January 8 MSCC holds its third meeting on constitution and politics in Kuala Lumpur.

A decision is reached to produce all the proceedings for public consumption just as the British colonial government had done in Sarawak. January 31 British colonial government in Sabah produces a white paper, similar to the one published in Sarawak.

It is also translated into local languages and distributed widely.

February 1 MSCC holds its fourth and last meeting in Singapore.

February 3 All MSCC delegates sign a memorandum of proposals and recommendations which is then published in Sarawak and Sabah.

The Cobbold Commission is set up to seek the views of the people of Sarawak and Sabah on the formation of Malaysia.

Members of the commission are Lord Cobbold (chairman), Sir Anthony Abell and Sir David Watheraton (British representatives) Dato Wong Pow and Ghazali Shafie (representatives of Malaya).

February 19 The Cobbold Commission arrives in Kuching to begin public hearings at 35 centres.

March 6 Deputy Prime Minister of Malaya, Tun Abdul Razak, said that at that time only Britain and the Philippines were involved in the territorial claims over Sabah.

April 17 The Cobbold Commission completes its task in Sarawak and fl ies to Jesselton to continue its investigations at 15 centres in Sabah.

April 24 The legislative assembly of the Philippines unanimously approve “Resolution No.7… the President of the Republic to take the necessary steps consistent with international law and procedure for the recovery of a certain portion of the Island of Borneo and adjacent islands which appertain to the Philippines”.

April 29 Sultan of Sulu hands over the rule of Sulu (which has never been colonised by Spain or the United States of America) to the Philippines until she was accepted as an independent sovereign country.

May 24 The British government sends a memorandum to the ruler of the Philippines on its claim to a part of Sabah.

The other part was previously under the Brunei sultanate, particularly along the west coast.

June 22 The ruler of the Philippines sends a note to the British government on its claim over Sabah.

June 24 Donald Stephen, President United Kadazan Organisation (UNKO), says the people of Sabah challenge the claim by the Philippines.

June 27 Sarawak Chinese Association (SCA) Party formed.

July The Cobbold Commission sends its report to the government of Malaya and Britain .

July 18 Sultan Omar Ali Saifudin, Sultan Brunei, declares that Brunei will join Malaysia separately from Sarawak and Sabah.

July 20 Parti Pesaka formed.

The ruler of the Philippines sends a note on its Sabah claim to the government of Malaya.

August 1 Negotiations on the Cobbold Report between Malaya led by Tunku Abdul Rahman and his colleague from Britain to announce the formation of the Federation of Malaysia on August 31, 1963 after it is approved by their respective legislatures.

August 30 Inter – Government Committee (IGC) holds a preparatory meeting in Jesselton, Sabah, and sets up its headquarters there.

Sabah political parties submit the Twenty Points claim to Deputy Prime Minister of the Federation of Malaya Tun Abdul Razak and Lord Landsowne in Jesselton.

September 12 The Sabah State Legislative Assembly unanimously approves the formation of the Federation of Malaysia and the establishment of the IGC.

September 26 The Sarawak State Legislative Assembly unanimously approves the formation of the Federation of Malaysia and the establishment of the IGC.

The Sabah Alliance is set up by Pasok Momogun, Sabah United Party, United Kadazan Organization (UNKO) and United Sabah National Organization (USNO).

September Philippines Vice President, Emmanuel Paleaez, declares his country’s claims to a part of Sabah at the United Nations, New York. October 16 Sabah Alliance declares the opposition of the people of Sabah on the claim of the Philippines.

December Sabah Alliance wins the election with 131 out of 137 contested constituencies with a manifesto based on the Twenty Points.

December 8 Partai Rakyat Brunei causes a revolt in Brunei, Limbang, Lawas and Miri.

December 9 A M Azahari, Partai Rakyat Brunei chairman, announces the North Kalimantan Revolution Government while in exile in Manila. He is actually a citizen of Lebanon; his father had married the daughter of Hugh Low, the British Governor of Labuan, who had married a Sarawakian woman, Dayang Loyang.

December 20 IGC holds its last meeting in Kuala Lumpur.

It had held 24 meetings in Kuching, Jeselton, Singapore and Kuala Lumpur.

1963 January 5 Curfew from 6pm to 6am is enforced in Limbang. January 8 The Governor declares as illegal the Sarawak Farmers’ Association, Kesatuan Rakyat Insaf Sarawak, Chung Hua Alumni Association Sibu, Tentera Nasional Kalimantan Utara, Angkatan Dosu Berantu and Angkatan Rakyat Anak Sabah.

January 28 British Foreign Secretary Lord Home and Philippines Vice President Emmanuel Palaez begins negotiations on claims over Sabah until February 1 with no results.

Diosado Macapagal, the President of the Philippines states for the fi rst time his country’s opposition to the formation of Malaysia in his state-of-thenation speech in the Philippines Congress.

February 11 Dr Subandario, Indonesia Foreign Minister, officially objects to the formation of Malaysia.

February 23 IGC submits Reports to the Governments of the Four Parties Concerned – Britain, Malaya, Sarawak and Sabah.

The IGC report is published. March 8 Sarawak State Legislative Assembly unanimously adopts the recommendations in the IGC report.

March 13 Sabah State Legislative Assembly adopts recommendations in the IGC report.

April Sarawak local council elections are held until June.

May 15 Third Rajah Sir Charles Vyner Brooke passes away in England.

May 31 Tunku Abdul Rahman, Prime Minister of Malaya and Sukarno, President of the Republic of Indonesia negotiate in Tokyo for an agreement o n the formation of Malaysia and to stop Indonesia from sending her army into Sarawak and Sabah.

June18 The Sarawak Flag will use the old fl ag with a crown in the centre.

June19 The results of the election are announced – Alliance 78, Independent 67, SUPP 16 and Panas 11. June 20 31 Independent legislators join Alliance, bringing the tally to 119.

July 9 The Malaysia Agreement is reached by Britain, Malaya, Singapore, Sarawak and Sabah.

Brunei withdraws at the last moment.

It is signed by Temenggong Jugah, Dato Bandar Abang Mustapa, Abang Openg, Ling Beng Siew and PEH Pike.

From Sabah are Donald Stephens, Dato Mustapha, Khoo Siak Chiew, G S Sundang, WS Holley, and WKH Jones.

From Singapore are Lee Kuan Yew, and the representatives of Malaya and Britain are Tunku Abdul Rahman and Harold Macmillan respectively.

July 19 British House of Commons approves the Malaysia Bill to enable Sarawak and Sabah to form Malaysia.

July 22 Stephen Kalong Ningkan chosen as the first Chief Minister of Sarawak along with the state’s first cabinet.

July 30 Tunku Abdul Rahman, Sukarno and Macapagal meet at the Manila Summit.

August 5 Manila Summit ends resulting in Manila Declaration in which the three countries agree to form a new confederation called Maphilindo (short for Malaysia, Philippines and Indonesia).

There is also a Manila Accord in which the three countries agree to work together in politics, economics, socially and culturally.

Philippines and Indonesia request that the Secretary General of the United Nations get the views of the people of Sarawak and Sabah on the formation of Malaysia.

August 3 Governor Sir Alexander Waddel launches the 1962 uprising memorial for British commandos who were defeated in Limbang.

August 6 Teo Kui Seng, Natural Resources Minister, also the chairman of the Malaysia Day celebration, announces the programme.

August 8 Sabah Legislative Assembly unanimously passes the Merdeka motion to join Malaysia and also approves the Malaysia Agreement.

August 15 Parliament of the Federation of Malaysia approves the Malaysia Agreement.

August 16 United Nation Malaysia Mission (UNMM) arrives and carries out its task to get the opinion of the people of Sarawak and Sabah until September 5, 1963.

Their arrival is also met with anti-Malaysia protestors at the Kuching Airport.

August18 Indonesian soldiers and insurgents invade Sungai Bangkit in Song, resulting in a casualty.

August 19 Abdul Taib Mahmud, Communication and Works Minister, visits the headquarters of the Public Works Department in Kuching.

The merdeka celebration is postponed from August 31 to September 16.

August 26 Yang Di-Pertuan Agong of Malaya approves the Malaysian constitution. August 27 Demonstrations against Malaysia in Sibu in connection with the arrival of the UNMM team.

August 29 Yang Di-Pertuan Agong signs the Malaysia Declaration, fi xed on September 16, 1963.

Anti-Malaysia protest in Miri on the arrival of the UNMM team results in a clash with the police. August 30 UNMM team arrives in Limbang, its last stop.

September 1 UNMM representative, Lawrence Michelmore, meets representatives from Alliance and SUPP at the State Legislative Assembly chambers.

September 4 Sarawak Legislative Assembly approves Malaysia motion with 38 votes for and fi ve against.

Stephen Kalong Ningkan tables the motion which states: “Be it resolved that this Council reaffirms its support for Malaysia, endorses the formal agreement which was signed in London on the 9th July and, while regretting that the Federation of Malaysia could not be brought into being on the 31st August, welcomes the decision to establish it on the 16th September, 1963.” September 5 UNMM team leaves Sarawak.

September 11 Chief Minister, Stephen Kalong Ningkan, and three ministers as well as 10 members of the Alliance fl y to Kuala Lumpur to meet the Prime Minister and the Secretary of the Colony of Britain, Duncan Sandys. September 13 UNMM presents its report.

“The Mission is satisfi ed that through its hearings it was able to reach a crosssection of the population in all walks of life and that the expressions of opinion that it heard represent the views of a sizeable majority of the population.

The Mission is convinced that the time devoted to hearings and the number of localities visited was adequate and enabled it to fully carry out its terms of references.”

Sir Alexander Waddell announces that Datu Abang Openg is appointed by the Yang Di-Pertuan as the first Yang Di-Pertua of Sarawak beginning from Malaysia Day.

Temenggong Jugah Barieng is appointed to the Federal Cabinet as the Sarawak Affairs Minister.

September 14 Duncan Sandys arrives in Kuching for a brief visit. September 15 Dr M Sockalingam is appointed as the Speaker of the Sarawak Dewan Undangan Negeri.

British colonial Governor, Sir Alexander Waddell, and wife leave Astana, the offi cial Brooke residence and that of British governors since 1870, at exactly 12.30pm.

September 16 Tun Abang Openg is sworn in as the fi rst Yang Di- Pertua Negeri Sarawak. Prime Minister of Malaysia Tunku Abdul Rahman reads the Proclamation of Malaysia in front of the Yang Di-Pertuan Agong, Raja- Raja Melayu and thousands of citizens at Stadium Merdeka to mark the birth of a new country named, the Federation of Malaysia.

He says: “The great day we have long awaited has come at last – the birth of Malaysia.

In a warm spirit of joy and hope ten million people of many races in all the states of Malaya, Singapore, Sarawak and Sabah now join hands in freedom and joy.”

Khir Johari reads Proclamation of Malaysia as the representative of the Prime Minister to mark the independence of Sarawak in the presence of Tuan Yang Terutama Tun Abang Openg, Chief Minister Datuk Stephen Kalong Ningkan, the State Cabinet and the people at Padang Sentral (now Padang Merdeka), Kuching, and in all divisions of Sarawak.

(Chronology is translated from the offi cial 45th anniversary souvenir book, ‘Perayaan 45 Tahun Sarawak Maju Dalam Malaysia, 1963 – 2008).

How to deal with Sarawak and Sabah?

The perception in the two states is that current leaders in Putrajaya know very little about 1963.

Sarawakians from all walks from life just celebrated their July 22 Independence Day for only the second time since 1963. It will be the turn of the peninsula and Sabah on August 31. This will be followed by Malaysia Day on September 16.

In previous years, the emphasis was only on August 31, while September 16 has only been observed for the last two years, 50 years after Sabah and Sarawak came together with Malaya in 1963 in a federation.

Before 2013, the police in Sabah and Sarawak would arrest anyone who observed September 16 and shoo away speakers at any public gathering on the occasion.

The Sarawak Government was forced to acknowledge July 22, over the hostility of Putrajaya, after activists demanded that it state in no uncertain terms when their homeland became independent from British rule. They warned that they would not accept the official line in school text books that “Sabah and Sarawak achieved independence through Malaysia on August 31.”

Not surprisingly, the perception in Borneo is that the new generation of leaders in Putrajaya knows little about 1963.

The past has caught up with us to haunt our future.

The Inspector General of Police, Khalid Abu Bakar, for one, demanded to know on the eve of July 22 whether the Sarawak4Sarawakians (S4S) movement was working towards the secession of the state from the federation. He warned that the Sedition Act would be invoked against S4S activists. In response, S4S revised its slogan to the even more controversial “We are Sarawakians” for next year’s celebration of July 22.

In the streets of Kuala Lumpur, the perception of the man in the street is that Sabah and Sarawak are unhappy with Malaysia and can’t understand “why are these people, so far away, with us, when they can be on their own?”

Such views are particularly voiced among non-Malays, who tend to be more outspoken on the relationship across the South China Sea. Malays tend to hold their peace on the issue as they cannot fathom how it concerns them immediately or affects them. They can’t afford the luxury of going beyond immediate bread-and-butter issues, but these are also the main pre-occupation of the others in the peninsula, including the media.

The press in the peninsula takes notice of Sabah and Sarawak only when matters involving the two states’ relationship with the Federal Government are raised and turn acrimonious. Otherwise, it is not interested in covering Sabah and Sarawak. Kinabalu and Lahad Datu were seen as international issues.

Companies in the peninsula, and certain politicians, see Sabah and Sarawak only in terms of their bottom line.

In Sarawak, more so than in Sabah, not a day has passed since 1963 without the people waking up and asking themselves the question: “How did we get into this situation? Why are we with Malaya on the other side of this big sea? They are so far away, even further than the moon. At least the moon is something that we can see every night. Why can’t we be on our own?”

The way forward

The way forward for Sarawak, in the view of some people, including Adenan Satem, is full autonomy.

As has been stated by Prime Minister Najib Abdul Razak, the Federal Government agrees in principle that Sabah and Sarawak should have more powers. Najib sees this as handing over the responsibility for federal departments in Sabah and Sarawak to locals and/or the Sabah and Sarawak governments. As a rule of thumb, he believes that “what they can do, let them do.”

He draws the line when it comes to the oil and gas resources of Sabah and Sarawak. For the people in Borneo, this issue is non-negotiable. Either Petronas has to play ball or leave the region.

The issue is simple: the people in Sabah and Sarawak want Putrajaya to get out of the way. They want to be masters of their destiny. They can no longer accept having the Federal Government tell them what to do or what not to do in their homelands.

Patently, there’s a need to focus on the relationship between Sabah and Sarawak with the peninsula generally and with the Federal Government particularly.

All politics must be about the restructuring of political power and the restructuring of resources. Sabah and Sarawak must have power over themselves and control over their resources.

The only way that the Federal Government can get the people of Sabah and Sarawak immediately on its side is to help them deal with the local elite, who are seen at the moment as simply squatting on them. Given this situation, it’s not defensible, no longer tenable or sustainable in going forward for the local elite to be seen as proxies, stooges and rogue elements of the Federal Government and working against the interests of the people.

Source: http://www.freemalaysiatoday.com/category/opinion/2015/07/27/how-to-deal-with-sarawak-and-sabah/

Tuesday, 28 July 2015

Tukarkan Gelaran "Ketua Menteri" Kepada "Perdana Menteri" Bagi Ketua Kerajaan Negara Sabah dan Negara Sarawak!

Pihak SSKM-SSU(UK) ingin membawa anda semua untuk kembali berbincang tentang satu isu yang telah ditimbulkan oleh seorang YB daripada negara Sarawak yang telah menjadi kontroversi dan bahan jenaka orang awam sebelum ini. Hasil daripada kajian dokumen-dokumen yang telah berjaya diperolehi, ingin pihak kami memberikan penjelasan tentang perkara ini kepada kerajaan negara Sabah, kerajaan negara Sarawak dan rakyat di kedua-dua negara Borneo ini. Gelaran kepada Ketua Pemerintah (executive) di negara masing-masing sebenarnya mesti bergelar "Perdana Menteri (Prime Minister)" dan BUKAN "Ketua Menteri (Chief Minister)".

Sebelum ini, YB.Fong Pau Teck telah bercadang untuk mengusulkan didewan Undangan Negara Sarawak untuk menukarkan gelaran "Chief Minister of Sarawak" kepada "Prime Minister of Sarawak". Apa yang ingin dilakukan oleh YB. Fong Pau Teck sebenarnya adalah mengikut Memorandum (sesetengah orang mengatakan Perjanjian) melalui persefahaman  yang telah dipersetujui didalam 18 dan 20 Perkara (18 and 20 Points).

Apabila meneliti dokumen asal yang telah disimpan di Arkib London, pihak kami mendapati bahawa terdapat pengeditan dan penipuan yang telah berlaku.

Perkara 13 didalam 18 dan 20 Perkara yang asal (original) mengatakan bahawa;

Point 13. State Government

(a) The Prime Minister should be elected by unofficial members of Legislative Council;

(b) there should be a proper Ministerial system in North Borneo.

Untuk melihat buktinya, sila lihat pada Gambar 1.0 dibawah yang merupakan gambar dokumen yang telah diambil oleh kumpulan "Research Team" bagi mencungkil segala rahsia yang masih menunggu untuk didedahkan bagi tujuan kesedaran dan rujukan umum.

Gambar 1.0
Manakala Perkara 13 didalam 18 dan 20 Perkara yang telah diedit mengatakan bahawa;

Point 13. State Government

(a) The Chief Minister should be elected by unofficial members of Legislative Council;

(b) there should be a proper Ministerial system in North Borneo.

Dalam ertikata lain, terdapat pengeditan perkataan "Prime Minister" kepada "Chief Minister" didalam dokumen yang diterbitkan semula tentang 18 dan 20 Perkara Negara Sarawak dan Negara Sabah.

Apakah kepentingan yang dimiliki oleh gelaran ini sehinggakan ia mesti ditukarkan daripada "Chief Minister" kepada "Prime Minister"? Jawapannya ialah "Identiti" dan "kuasa" yang dimiliki oleh gelaran ini "memberikan satu pengiktirafan status penting kepada sesebuah kerajaan".

Untuk memahami dengan lebih lanjut lagi, pihak kami akan menjadikan negara Singapura sebagai contoh yang paling terbaik dalam memberikan kefahaman kepada anda semua kerana jalan penceritaan sejarah negara Singapura adalah hampir sama dengan perjalanan sejarah di Borneo.

Sila lihat pada Gambar 1.1 dibawah yang menunjukkan sejarah ringkas Kerajaan Negara Singapura.

Gambar 1.1
Disini, pihak kami hanya ingin memfokuskan kepada peringkat dimana negara Singapura memperolehi status "Self-Government" daripada British. Sebelum pembentukkan Persekutuan Malaysia, kerajaan negara Singapura telah memperolehi status "Full Internal Self-Government" daripada British, status gelaran daripada "Partial Internal Self-Government (Legislative Council)" yang membawa gelaran "Chief Minister" telah ditukar menjadi "Prime Minister (Legislative Assembly)". Didalam peringkat ini, kerajaan negara Singapura mempunyai "Kuasa Penuh" terhadap Pentadbiran Dalaman Negara Singapura (internal administration of Singapore State Government) tetapi kuasa tentang Keselamatan Dalaman (Internal Security) dikongsikan oleh kedua-dua pihak. Hanya hal-hal kuasa yang berkaitan dengan Keselamatan Luaran (External Security), Pertahanan (Defence) dan Hubungan Luar Negara (External Affair) sahaja yang masih dimiliki oleh British pada ketika itu.

Negara North Borneo juga telah melalui Peringkat "Legislative Council" kepada "Legislative Assembly". Manakala Negara Sarawak pula menggunakan nama "Council Negri" pada waktu itu yang membawa maksud yang sama dengan "Legislative Council" dan kini dikenali sebagai "Legislative Assembly". 

Kembali kepada negara Sabah (pada waktu itu dikenali sebagai North Borneo) dan negara Sarawak, sejarah sudah mencatatkan didalam perjalanan politik dikedua-dua negara Borneo ini, masing-masing telah mencapai status "Full Self-Government". Negara Sarawak Berkerajaan Sendiri pada 22 Julai 1963 manakala Negara North Borneo (kini dipanggil Sabah) pada 31 Ogos 1963. Ciri-ciri yang dimiliki oleh sebuah Kerajaan Penuh (Full Self-Government) ini semua dapat dilihat melalui Memorandum/Perjanjian 18 & 20 Perkara kerana segala Perkara-perkara penting ada tercatat didalamnya.

Persoalannya, bolehkah gelaran "Chief Minister" itu ditukarkan kepada "Prime Minister" melalui Dewan Undangan Negara Sabah dan Negara Sarawak? Jawapannya BOLEH!

Lihat kepada Perkara Perkara 16: Keselamatan Perlembagaan (Point 16: Constitutional Safeguard) pada gambar 1.0 diatas tadi. Ia mengatakan bahawa;

Point 16: Constitutional Safeguard

No amendment modification or withdrawal or any special safeguard granted to North Borneo should be made by the Central Government without the positive concurrence of the Government of the State of North Borneo.

The power of amending the Constitution of the State of North Borneo should belong exclusively to the people in the State.

Perkara ini sudah jelas mengatakan bahawa segala pindahan boleh dilakukan namun ia mestilah tidak mengubah konsistensi Perlembagaan Negara Sabah dan Perlembagaan Negara Sarawak. Jikalau ia berlaku, maka pindahan perlembagaan tersebut adalah tidak sah (void). Sukacitanya, untuk perkara "gelaran Ketua Menteri kepada Perdana Menteri (title of Chief Minister to Prime Minister)", ia langsung tidak mengubah atau menjejaskan sebarang konsistensi Perlembagaan di kedua-dua negara Borneo ini. Tambahan lagi, ia sememangnya sudah tercatat didalam Memorandum/Perjanjian ini bahawa gelaran tersebut adalah diatas kuasa "Legislative Council" yang kini dikenali sebagai "Legislative Assembly". Gelaran ini sangat penting untuk dimiliki agar "status" Negara Sabah dan Negara Sarawak dapat dilihat dengan jelas sekali sebagai "Rakan Kongsi" didalam Persekutuan Malaysia yang dibentuk pada 16 September 1963. Sejarah sudah mencatatkan bahawa Kerajaan Persekutuan Malaysia pada tahun 1963 sehingga tahun 1965 telah memiliki Dua (2) Perdana Menteri. Pada ketika itu, ia seharusnya memiliki Empat (4) orang Perdana Menteri sebagai membuktikan bahawa Persekutuan Malaysia ini adalah Perkongsian Rakan daripada Empat Buah Negara. Setelah Negara Singapura menarik diri keluar daripada Persekutuan Malaysia pada 9 Ogos 1965, seharusnya dan semestinya tinggal Tiga (3) Perdana Menteri didalam  Persekutuan Malaysia. Satu daripada Malaya, satu daripada Negara Sabah dan satu lagi daripada Negara Sarawak.

Pematuhan kepada 18 dan 20 Perkara adalah satu KEWAJIBAN! Jikalau mana-mana Perkara yang terkandung didalamnya tidak dipatuhi, maka jangan sesekali memaksa Bangsa Borneo untuk menghormati Perkara 7. Bangsa Borneo juga mempunyai HAK dan SEBAB untuk TIDAK MEMATUHINYA.

Sekarang tanyakan soalan ini pada diri anda masing-masing, adakah Persekutuan Malaysia ini merupakan satu Rakan Kongsi atau satu bentuk Penjajahan Halus yang dikenali sebagai Neo-Colonisme? Siapakah yang sebenarnya sedang menjajah Negara Sabah dan Negara Sarawak?

***Neo-Colonialisme membawa maksud kepada Penjajahan dalam bentuk kuasa politik, ekonomi, budaya atau tekanan untuk mengawal sesebuah negara yang telah mencapai kemerdekaannya secara halus agar mengikut telunjuk dan arahan serta kehendak mereka (Penjajah)***

Artikel ini hanya memfokuskan kepada justifikasi kepada mengapa perlunya dan mesti menukar nama gelaran ketua Pemerintah Negara Sabah dan Negara Sarawak daripada "Ketua Menteri (Chief Minister)" kepada "Perdana Menteri (Prime Minister)" sahaja.

Pendedahan tentang "Adakah Negara Sabah dan Negara Sarawak sebuah negara yang Merdeka" dan perkara-perkara yang berkaitan, yang perlu diketahui oleh rakyat Borneo daripada negara Sabah dan negara Sarawak akan didedahkan selepas 31 Ogos 2015 ini. Ia bakal mengejutkan anda semua kerana pendedahan ini adalah berdasarkan kepada fakta dan bukti yang sahih.

Jikalau anda bersetuju dengan apa yang telah didedahkan didalam artikel ini, pihak kami hanya meminta anda untuk melakukan satu perkara sahaja iaitu sila sebarkan info ini kepada semua orang kerana ia adalah info yang SANGAT PENTING agar semua rakyat negara Sabah dan rakyat negara Sarawak memahaminya dengan sepenuhnya. Tindakan yang tepat akan dapat diambil setelah anda mengetahui kebenaran dan ini adalah kebenaran yang selama ini telah disembunyikan malah didiamkan. Bermula daripada hari ini, Perlembagaan Negara Sabah dan Negara Sarawak mestilah dijulangkan dan dijadikan sebagai rujukan utama dan bukan perlembagaan persekutuan malaysia. 

Ini kerana, apa-apa pindahan didalam Perlembagaan Persekutuan Malaysia tidaka akan memberikan kesan kepada Kerajaan Negara Sabah dan Kerajaan Negara Sarawak jikalau kedua-dua Kerajaan Borneo ini tidak meluluskan. Sekarang, anda faham?

Akhir kata, pihak kami ingin menyampaikan satu teguran ikhlas buat CM Sarawak. Janganlah kerap kali mengatakan sesuatu perkara itu "Bodoh". Sekarang, siapakah yang kelihatan "Bodoh"?

Saturday, 25 July 2015

Bumburing: Jeffrey not Umno Sabah/BN stooge

Jeffrey has all along been consistent in his struggle for Sabah rights which has been brushed aside even by Umno Sabah

KOTA KINABALU: Tamparuli assemblyman Wilfred Bumburing said it was unbecoming of Sabah Opposition Chief Lajim Ukin to describe Bingkor assemblyman Jeffrey Kitingan as an Umno Sabah/Barisan Nasional (BN) “stooge” just because the latter and not he was included in the 40 per cent Committee negotiating with the Federal Government for the return of 40 per cent of the revenues collected in Sabah.

“Jeffrey has all along been consistent in his struggle for Sabah rights,” said Bumburing who is also President of the Angkatan Perubahan Sabah (APS). “Sabah’s rights have all these years been sidelined and brushed aside by the BN leaders especially after the entry of Umno.”

He pointed out that given the fact that Foreign Minister Anifah Aman organised the Public Forum which led to the formation of the 40 per cent committee, although seemingly hostile to Putrajaya, shows that leaders across the political divide are willing to come together in defence of Sabah’s constitutional rights. “Before Anifah entered the picture, Jeffrey had been brushed aside even in the assembly whenever he raised Sabah rights. “The atmosphere in the Sabah Assembly, dominated by Umno, turned hostile whenever Jeffrey spoke up on Sabah rights.”

“Even his own brother, Huguan Siou and Deputy Chief Minister Joseph Pairin Kitingan, criticized him and shouted him down.”

Bumburing called on Lajim to withdraw his statement against Jeffrey, apologise, and promise never to repeat something that would only further divide the Opposition and the people, and agree to support the work of the 40 per cent committee. “Lajim should stand with fellow Sabahan leaders and join in the struggle for the homeland instead of criticizing and coming up with insinuating comments on issues which he isn’t certain.”

Bumburing pointed out that Prime Minister Najib Abdul Razak met with the committee which he earlier proposed. “This fact should be appreciated by Lajim. Najib supporting the work of the Committee doesn’t mean that Jeffrey is being used as his tool.”

Bumburing expressed the hope that the 40 per cent Committee will not end up like so many other committees whose findings and reports ended up on a dusty shelf somewhere and were soon forgotten. “This seems to be the fate of the RCI Technical Committee headed by Pairin and the RCI Management Committee headed jointly by Home Minister Ahmad Zahid Hamidi and Chief Minister Musa Aman.”

Lajim fears that Jeffrey was being made use of by the Federal Government on the 40 per cent issue. “He was invited to meet with Najib recently on the 40 per cent issue while others including myself as Opposition Chief were left out.”

Jeffrey’s supporters, rebutting Lajim, pointed out that Jeffrey was the first to raise the 40 per cent issue.

The social media, coming to Jeffrey’s defence, has pointed out that it was the consensus among the people that the Bingkor assemblyman should be included in the committee. “He has been widely credited for raising the issue that 40 per cent of the revenues collected in Sabah by the Federal Government should be returned to the state government.”

“For the first Public Forum on the 40 per cent issue at the Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Jeffrey was initially not invited,” said Evelyn-Gobile Koh on Facebook. “But Sabahans pushed for his inclusion through the social media.”

“That was an eye-opener. He was invited again for the second Forum and by consensus from the floor it was suggested that Jeffrey should be chairman of the committee.”

Source: http://www.freemalaysiatoday.com/category/nation/sabahsarawak/2015/07/25/bumburing-jeffrey-not-umno-sabahbn-stooge/

S4S, Sadia may be charged

AG awaits police report before deciding on taking action against organisers of 722 Freedom, Independence Walk

KUCHING: Sarawak for Sarawakians (S4S) and Sarawak Dayak Iban Association (Sadia), the organisers of the July 22 parade here, may face police action if an ongoing investigation proves that they have breached the law.

According to Deputy Home Minister Datuk Seri Wan Junaidi Tuanku Jaafar, the Attorney-General would determine whether the ‘722 Sarawak Freedom and Independence Walk’ rally held here last Wednesday, which was attended by about 5,000 people, was illegal.

The decision would be made after the police had completed their investigation into the matter including recording statements from the organisers, he added.

“While the event was done in accordance with the Peaceful Assembly Act 2012, the organisers however still needed police permission to determine the proper venue for the event,” he said.

“I am not saying the parade was illegal but have the organisers received any police approval prior to the event?

“If the police said no but the organiser still proceeded with the parade then it is clearly against the police directive,” he told reporters after attending a Ramah Tamah Aidilfitri at SMK Bandar Baru Samariang yesterday.

Meanwhile, Peter John Jaban, one of those who organised the rally, claimed that he was questioned by the police for six hours yesterday.

“Twelve other coordinators were similarly questioned,” he said.

He said the S4S was not a registered entity and that people had come from throughout the state voluntarily to express their feelings peacefully.

Peter said future rallies would be more entertainment-oriented.

“We may even seek government aid. We will use a new slogan, ‘We are Sarawakians’, instead of ‘Sarawak for Sarawakians’ to show that it was an event for all Sarawakians, irrespective of race.

“We will welcome more people to participate, including members of political parties, as long as they do not turn up with their respective symbols and slogans,” he said.

Peter said the gathering was not about getting Sarawak to secede from Malaysia.

“It was all about Sarawak getting fairly treated as a founding member of the Federation of Malaysia,” he said.

He said that at no time during his speech at the rally did he touch on secession.

“The goal was clear. We celebrated Sarawak. All we want is a fair deal for our state as promised to us under the Malaysia Agreement 1963,” he said.

On another matter, Wan Junaidi said Petaling Jaya MP Tony Pua was among three individuals barred from leaving the country but Pandan MP Rafizi Ramli on the other hand was not barred.

Source: http://www.theborneopost.com/2015/07/25/s4s-sadia-may-be-charged/#ixzz3gtuwCeZP

‘We are Sarawakians’ slogan replaces controversial S4S

Man behind July 22 Independence Day Walk makes the change after being interrogated for six hours by police over his Sarawak4Sarawakians movement.

KUCHING: Radio Free Sarawak’s (RFS) Peter John Jaban, the man behind this year’s “722 Sarawak Independence Walk” has decided to change the slogan for next year’s walk from the controversial “Sarawak4Sarawakians (S4S) to the even more controversial “We are Sarawakians”.

There’s no mention of Sarawakians being Malaysians.

The Sarawak Chief Minister had earlier endorsed Sarawak4Sarawakians and did not think that it was a controversial slogan. “Sarawak should be for Sarawakians.”

Peter made the decision after he was interrogated for six hours by police on Thursday for organizing the July 22 walk in Kuching and elsewhere in the state in conjunction with Sarawak Independence Day. “Sarawak4Sarawakians was not registered because it’s an idea, a belief. It’s the same as the ‘agi idup, agi ngelaban’ (as long as there’s life, we fight) war cry of the Malaysian Rangers.”

“We are Sarawakian”, he said, would not be registered either because it’s also an idea, a belief, a movement.

“I was the only one interrogated for so long,” said Peter on being shabbily treated by the authorities. “The other 12 members of the organizing committee were only questioned for about 15 minutes.”

“I could not cancel ‘722 Sarawak Independence Walk’, the event, as demanded by Inspector General of Police Khalid Abu Bakar because people from all over Sarawak, 10,000 of them, had already gathered in Kuching alone.”

The police, he added, wanted to know whether S4S was working towards the secession of Sarawak from the Federation. “I told them no one talked about secession. We just wanted to observe Sarawak’s Independence Day which falls on July 22.”

August 31, he pointed out to the police, was the Independence Day for Malaya in 1957 and Sabah in 1963. “16 September is not Independence Day.”

Several leaders, he said, also spoke up for full autonomy for Sarawak. “If I am being seditious, then they are also being seditious.”

He pointed that among others, Sarawak Chief Minister Adenan Satem and PRS Chief James Masing spoke on full autonomy during the official celebration in Kuching. Others, he said, came from SUPP, DAP, PKR, and UPP.

Sarawak4Sarawakians was inspired by the Sabah4Sabahans movement initiated by the Parti Bersatu Sabah (PBS) and then Sabah Foundation Director Jeffrey Kitingan in 1985.

Source: http://www.freemalaysiatoday.com/category/highlight/2015/07/25/we-are-sarawakians-slogan-replaces-controversial-s4s/

Prowess of Sarawak

Sarawak is one of two Malaysian states on the island of Borneo. Known as Bumi Kenyalang ("Land of the Hornbills"), Sarawak is situated on the northwest of the island, bordering the Malaysian state of Sabah to the northeast, Indonesia to the south, and surrounding Brunei. It is the largest state in Malaysia. The administrative capital is Kuching, which has a population of 658,562.1 Major cities and towns include Miri (pop. 269,380), Sibu (pop. 209,616) and Bintulu (pop. 189,695).

Please click this >>>LINK<<< to download it

Friday, 24 July 2015

Jawapan RASMI SSKM-SSU(UK) Kepada Pengguna Facebook Yang Bernama Deddy Mul


Pihak SSKM-SSU(UK) ingin membuat kenyataan RASMI ringkas berhubung dengan beberapa perkara yang telah dibangkitkan oleh seorang individu yang dikenali sebagai Deddy Mul's (nama Facebook). Antara perkara yang dibangkitkannya adalah seperti berikut;
Mungking saya akan sokong penuh perjuangan SSKM sekiranya terbukti beberapa perkara. Antaranya;
  1. Bila bandar utama di Sabah dikuasai semula oleh parti tempatan diketuai bumiputra.
  2. Namakan pemimpin tertinggi didalam SSKM yang mewakili kepelbagaian kaum di Sabah termasuk Bajau, Suluk, Brunei, Bisaya, Kedayan, Sungai dsb. Bukan cuma KDMR.
  3. Namakan pemimpin tertinggi didalam SSKM secara seimbang yang mewakili masyarakat Islam, penulisan ilmiah membuktikan penduduk asal di Sabah antaranya masyarakat Bajau, Suluk Muslim.
  4. Suara utama yang bercakap soal hak Sabah for Sabahan perlu berada di Sabah (bukan disemenanjung atau di UK), dan apabila orang Sabah (bukan orang malaya atau cina atau india atau pakistan dsb) dan untuk kuasa orang Sabah (bukan orang malaya atau orang british atau australia atau israel atau amerika).
 JAWAPANNYA:
  1. Hal politik itu diserahkan sepenuhnya kepada parti-parti tempatan yang Pro Sabahan untuk melakukan tugasnya. Apa yang kami lakukakan adalah memberi kesedaran secara keseluruhan tentang mengapa sokongan perlu diberikan kepada parti-parti tempatan yang Pro Sabahan dan bukan parti-parti malaya dan tempatan yang pro malaya. Kesedaran ini diberikan melalui sejarah politik yang berlaku di negara Sabah.
  2. Maaf. Siapakah pemimpin-pemimpin yang mewakili etnik-etnik Orang Asal (Natives) dan bukan Orang Asal (Non-Natives) adalah bukan untuk didedahkan. Ia adalah rahsia. Cukuplah untuk anda tahu bahawa sudah ada pemimpin-pemimpin untuk etnik-etnik ini (Natives dan Non-Natives).
  3. Maaf. Pihak kami tidak boleh mendedahkan nama-nama mereka walaupun ia seharusnya diketahui. Masanya belum tiba untuk didedahkan. Apa yang penting, kepimpinan SSKM-SSU(UK) adalah seimbang kerana ia terdiri daripada pelbagai etnik yang menganuti pelbagai  agama di negara Sabah dan negara Sarawak. Islam, Kristian, Buddha dan golongan Free Thinker.
  4. Adakah belum cukup sudahkah suara-suara pemimpin tempatan yang lantang bersuara di negara Sabah tentang hak-hak yang dilanggari, tidak dihormati dan sebagainya? Jikalau semua suara itu hanya berada di Sabah, malaya akan tersenyum lebar kerana itulah yang berlaku selama ini sejak tahun 1970an lagi. Pihak antarabangsa tidak dapat memahami sepenuhnya keadaan yang berlaku di negara Sabah sehinggalah perkara ini didedahkan di peringkat antarabangsa. Kini, dunia sudah memahami bahawa bangsa Negara Sabah khususnya telah teraniaya dan ditindas oleh kerajaan bn-umno melalui projek IC, pencerobohan, penculikan yang  berlaku kerana hasil perbuatan tangan umno-bn yang terdiri daripada barua-barua tegar malaya seperti musa aman, yahya hussein, rahman dahlan, pairin dan seterusnya. Siapakah yang layak bercakap tentang Hak Sabah? Mereka adalah Bangsa Negara Sabah yang lahir di bumi Negara Dibawah Bayu tanpa mengira apa jua etnik yang terdiri daripada Natives dan Non-Natives.
Harap jawapan ini memenuhi persoalan yang telah dikemukan oleh anda.

The History of Sarawak under its Two Rajahs


As I have been requested to write a preface to The History of Sarawak under its Two White Rajahs, one of whom I have the honour to be, I must, first of all, assert that I have had nothing to do with the composition or writing of the book, and 1 do not profess to be a writer, otherwise than in a very ordinary sense, having left school at the age of twelve to enter the Navy.

To Download this pdf book, please click this >>>LINK<<<

Chong: No need to question ‘walk’ organisers

KUCHING: State DAP chairman Chong Chieng Jen sees no reason for the police to question the organisers of the ‘722 Sarawak Freedom’ and ‘Independence Day Walk’ held on Wednesday.

He said the organisers did not commit any crime, thus the need for the police to question them should not arise.

“What is there to investigate and complain about? The police can only investigate when a crime has been committed. What is there to investigate about the walk since they did not commit any crime,” he told a press conference at DAP headquarters here yesterday, which was also attended by Pending and Batu Kawah assemblywomen Violet Yong and Christina Chiew respectively.

Chong, who is Bandar Kuching MP and Kota Sentosa assemblyman, was asked to comment on Police Commissioner Datuk Seri Muhammad Sabtu Osman’s statement which stated that the involvement of S4S at the event in Song Kheng Hai rugby field had raised concerns since it was not a registered entity.

He was also quoted as saying that police would question the organisers which included Sarawak Dayak Iban Association (Sadia). Chong said S4S was just a concept which disagreed and agreed with certain issues, adding that even Chief Minister Datuk Patinggi Tan Sri Adenan Satem accepted the concept advocated by S4S.

“There is nothing for the police to investigate. Just do your job to combat crimes and not to poke your nose into other areas.”

Source: http://www.theborneopost.com/2015/07/24/chong-no-need-to-question-walk-organisers/#ixzz3gmRScN7r

Benarkah Negara Sarawak Belum Merdeka?

By Haji Julaihi Haji Suut

Barangkali inilah jawapan terbaik untuk pakar sejarah Datu Dr Sanib Said. Kenyataan yang dibuatnya boleh diibaratkan sebagai "Shooting self in the foot any which way you turn". Baru terfikir sebentar tadi oleh pakcik sambil memberi makan kerbau-kerbau di ladang. Tak payah fikir lama-lama. Tak perlu mentelaah buku sejarah bertingkat-tingkat. Tak perlu pangkat Datu atau Doktor. Cukup lah Common sense sahaja. Ada dua pendekatan untuk patahkan kenyataan Datu Sanib.

Pertama, Protokol antarabangsa. Menurut pendapat pakar perundangan, sebarang perjanjian di antara dua negara atau lebih adalah tidak sah MELAINKAN negara yang terlibat sudah merdeka terlebih dahulu. Nampak dah?

Dalam kes Malaysia, Persekutuan Tanah Melayu yang sudah merdeka tahun 1957 mahu membuat perjanjian antarabangsa dengan Sabah dan Sarawak. Jadi Sabah dan Sarawak mesti merdeka terlebih dahulu baru boleh buat perjanjian. Nampak dah?

Mungkin Datu Sanib mahu balas balik, mengatakan memang pun Sabah dan Sarawak diberi kemerdekaan sebelum Malaysia terbentuk pada 16 September 1963. HANYA beberapa jam sahaja pada 15 September. Mungkin dia juga nak kata, merdeka sekejap pun merdeka juga namanya asal cukup syarat.

Aha dia terlupa atau dia tersalah haribulan. Perjanjian di antara Malaya, Singapura, Sabah dan Sarawak yang bergelar Malaysia Act/Agreement yang memeteraikan penubuhan Persekutuan Malaysia telah ditandatangani di London pada tanggal 9 Julai 1963. Diulangi, 9 Julai.

Merujuk Protokol Antarabangsa yang sudah disebut tadi, hanya negara-negara merdeka boleh buat perjanjian. Ini bererti Sabah dan Sarawak masing-masing sudah jadi negara merdeka sebelumpun 16 September 1963. Sarawak raikan kemerdekaan pada 22 Julai. Jadi Datu Sanib sudah silap. Belajar banyak konon tapi perkara macam ini terlepas pandang.

Itu pendekatan pertama. Pendekatan kedua ialah ini:

Sekiranya Datu Sanib berkeras mengatakan Sabah dan Sarawak hanya merdeka beberapa jam sebelum terbentuknya Persekutuan Malaysia ini bererti dia telah mengakui kebenaran kata-kata Robert Pei dan Lina Soo. Ini bererti Persekutuan Malaysia terbentuk dengan cara haram.

Datu Sanib kata Sabah dan Sarawak merdeka pada 15 September 1963. Tetapi perjanjian antarabangsa dimeterai pada 9 Julai 1963 di London, tiga bulan sebelum merdeka. Mana boleh buat perjanjian kalau belum merdeka. Ini tidak sah di meja perjanjian antarabangsa.

Secara tidak langsung Datu Sanib akui ada kesilapan dalam Malaysia. SabahSarawak belum jadi sebuah negara merdeka lagi tetapi sudah pandai-pandai buat perjanjian antarabangsa dengan Malaya. Perjanjian sebegitu tidak dianggap sah. Secara tidak langsung Datu Sanib mengakui Persekutuan Malaysia sudah terbatal dengan sendirinya atas kesilapan teknikal. Terima kasih, Datu, dan selamat menyertai barisan Nasionalist Sarawak ‪#‎Silakan‬

Heed the people’s cry

Masing urges government to listen to the message sent out by the huge crowd celebrating the state’s Independence Day

KUCHING: The Sarawak for Sarawakians (S4S) rally on Wednesday is a wake-up call for the federal government which must acknowledge the message sent out by the participants.

Parti Rakyat Sarawak (PRS) president Tan Sri Datuk Amar Dr James Masing believed both the federal and state governments should take S4S rally seriously because of the composition of the crowd, the enthusiasm shown as well as their aspiration.

Amazed by the crowd which consisted of participants from all walks of life and from all ethnic groups including the disabled, the elderly and the young people, Masing said the federal government should not ignore it.

“What S4S is doing is correct. We must harness them. The federal government must not dismiss it as it may result in killing the messengers and missing the message. The federal government should listen to the message.”

Impressed by the enthusiasm shown by the young people who bought their full attire and their willingness to spend on painting colonial flags on their faces at the rally, the Baleh assemblyman hoped the enthusiasm could be ‘used, harvested and harnessed’ by the state government by including them in some of their official activities.

“I was impressed by them. There was this statement they painted on their vehicle – “We are not Chinese…we are not Dayak..we are not Malay. We are all Sarawakians.” Masing, also Minister of Land Development, said this showed that the participants had the right racial attitude and direction towards a better future.

“The racial attitude should also be emulated by Peninsular Malaysians,” he said. When contacted, Sarawak Dayak Iban Association (Sadia) president Sidi Munan said he gave his blessing to the S4S organiser, Peter John Jaban, to proceed with the assembly on three conditions, namely: no to the call for secession, adhere to the law and only seek recognition from the state government to commemorate July 22 as a public holiday for Sarawak.

“The police needed a registered society to organise the event, so I agreed that Sadia should be the registered society to apply for the permit on conditions they observed all the three things that I have told them to adhere to,” Sidi said.

Sidi asked Peter John to state the financier of the event and he was told that it would be self-financed by the participants who came from all over Sarawak.

“I asked this question because I do not want it to be infiltrated by any political party as Sadia is apolitical,” he said. Sidi also confirmed that Peter John was now an exco member of Sadia, being given the task to look after the social welfare of the Iban-based NGO and recruitment drive.

“He has been very helpful to those from the rural areas who are seeking jobs in towns and places like Kuching. He also helps us to look after the welfare of people who are poor and in need,” added Sidi.

He hoped the state government would listen to the voice of the over 5,000 people who attended the gathering and even engaged S4S in next year’s celebration of the same event.

“Actually I was surprised by the turn-out. We never expected such a big crowd. With such response from the people, we hope the state government will take their voices into consideration and declare July 22 as a public holiday for Sarawak to commemorate our Independence Day,” said Sidi.

Meanwhile, state CID chief SAC Dev Kumar said 13 people including Peter John were asked to give their statements after the event.

He said an investigation had been initiated against them based on their speeches under the Sedition Act.

“But on the whole the event was organised in an orderly manner and no untoward incident was reported,” said Dev Kumar.

Masing, Lo counter Sanib’s views on state’s independence

KUCHING: Tan Sri Datuk Amar Dr James Jemut Masing believes that Sarawak became an independent state on July 22, 1963.

Masing, who is state senior minister pointed out Datuk Stephen Kalong Ningkan was sworn in as chief minister on July 22, 1963 after a legal election process that was held in June-July 1963 and a cabinet was formed. Thus, he said a beginning of a self-rule for Sarawak began on July 22, 1963.

“Does self rule mean the beginning of a country’s independence? Yes. So from July 22, 1963, Sarawak was on its own as a self governing entity, “ Masing, who is Land Development Minister, told The Borneo Post when contacted yesterday.

Masing, was responding to a claim by Sarawak Malay Graduates Association president Datu Dr Sanib Said that it is wrong to think that July 22 is Sarawak’s Independence Day.

Sanid was quoted as saying that there had been factual errors and misleading assumptions concerning this date, particularly in newspapers and social media by some quarters.

He said July 22 was just the beginning of a process towards independence and Sarawak achieved independence from the British for only a few hours on Sept 15, 1963, when the colonial governor Sir Alexander Waddell left for Britain.

“The next day, Datuk Abang Openg Sapiee was proclaimed as the governor and at the same time, we formed Malaysia and our independence continued. It is on Sept 16 that Sarawak became independent in Malaysia.”

Sanib, who is also a historian, said he has done many studies on this period and believed that there was need for people to know the background of July 22.

“July 22 was when the governor proclaimed the appointment of Datuk Stephen Kalong Ningkan as the chief minister and new Supreme Council members who formed the first ministerial cabinet in Sarawak.

“We were not independent yet because some powers were still with the colonial governor and the Queen in London. July 22 marks the process of becoming independent. All colonies under British government must go through similar process. It was to train to local people to run the country,” he said.

Masing, who is Baleh assemblyman said the formative years of Sarawak and Malaysia as a Federation had been subjected to some confusion and interpretations.

“In part, it was due to the hurried nature the Federation was created and a few ‘participants’ taking part in the acts such as the UK, Malaya, Singapore, Philippines, Indonesia and later Sarawak and Sabah were brought in.

“Thus we had confusion on Malaysia’s independence, for instance, was it Aug 31 or Sept 16? Did Sarawak attain its independence on July 22 or Sept 16?”

Meanwhile, UPP secretary-general George Lo opined that Sanib’s view that Sarawak was ‘not independent on July 22 because some powers were still with the colonial governor and the Queen in London’ was too myopic.

“With all due respect to him, that view is too myopic. We need only look across to Australia where, to this day, the Governor General is still the representative of the Queen in London.

“Sarawak was as independent a nation on July 22, 1963 as Australia is independent today. And Australia is not the only example. Look across the Commonwealth countries.”

Lo, who is also UPP Batu Lintang branch chairman, said the mere fact that some vestige of symbolic power remained with the colonial governor did not detract from the greater symbolism when the colonial flag was lowered and that the Sarawak flag raised and Sarawak had its own government and its own Chief Minister on July 22, 1963. He called on Sanib: “Please don’t try to rain on our parade as Sarawakians celebrate that historic day of independence on 22 July”.

Thursday, 23 July 2015

‘Just fighting for our rights, nothing more’

KUCHING: The ‘722 Sarawak Freedom and Independence Day Walk’ that attracted over 5,000 people yesterday was all about Sarawakians wanting the state to be treated as equal partners.

It is not a call for the state to secede from Malaysia, assured its organising chairman, Peter John Jaban.

He added that the main aim of the rally was to show to all Malaysians that the multi-racial communities in the state could live in harmony and unity in their struggles to uphold the state’s rights. It was also being used as a platform to call for July 22 to be gazetted as a public holiday, to recognise Sarawak’s independence in the history curriculum, to reinstate English as the medium of instruction in schools, a call for greater infrastructure development in the rural areas, and for the federal government to grant the state fair equity in oil and gas revenue derived from the state resources.

“We are here to celebrate the historic day when Sarawak gained independence. I want the public to know the history and the right date of our historical past. We must unite and show solidarity.

“Sarawak obtained its independence from British colonial rule on July 22, 1963, prior to the formation of Malaysia on Sept 16 that year. This rally is not about calling for Sarawak to secede from Malaysia, but for the people to understand our history and to know our rights,” he told reporters when met after the rally at Song Kheng Hai Rugby Field at Padungan here yesterday.

The event to commemorate Sarawak’s independence from British Colonial rule was organised by Sarawak Dayak Iban Association (Sadia) and the Sarawak for Sarawakians (S4S) movement.

Happy with the big turnout, Peter hoped the government would listen to the messages conveyed by the people at the rally.

He said he would write to the Chief Minister Datuk Patinggi Tan Sri Adenan Satem on the demands of the people and the calls to review the Malaysian Agreement 1963 and Petroleum Development Act 1974.

The event proceeded peacefully even though Inspector-general of Police (IGP) Tan Sri Khalid Abu Bakar’s had advised it should not be held due to concerns it would be used to stir secessionist sentiments.

Peter thanked the police for allowing the rally to go ahead. He noted that police’s presence at the event was light.

He assured that the event would always remain apolitical because the movement did not want to be associated nor involved with any political bickering happening in the state and country.

Thousands of participants gathered as early as 7am at the Jubilee Ground car park before marching some two kilometres to the venue. A few gathered and walked from Padang Merdeka.

During the two-hour rally, a section of the crowd gathered together to form the figures ‘S4S’ and ‘722’.

A flag-raising ceremony was also held and the old state national anthem ‘Fairland Sarawak’ and ‘Ibu Pertiwiku” were played.

Various banners and placards in support of Sarawak’s rights and equality were displayed as the crowd chanted slogans such as ‘Sarawak for Sarawakians’, ‘Agi Idup Agi Ngelaban’ and `Dum Spiro Spero’ during the rally.

Some of the participants were from other parts of the state, some from as far as Lawas and Belaga. Most were clad in black T-shirts with Sarawak for Sarawakians emblazoned on them and waving post independent Sarawak Kingdom flags. The crowd dispersed at around 10am, peacefully walking towards their earlier meeting points with police escort to direct traffic.

Source: http://www.theborneopost.com/2015/07/23/just-fighting-for-our-rights-nothing-more/#ixzz3ghCOlKaR

Sarawak leader says July 22 more important for state than August 31

A senior minister in Sarawak has joined the call to accord greater recognition to July 22, 1963, the day the state got its independence from its former colonial masters, the Borneo Post reported.

State minister of Land Development Tan Sri James Masing said the state should officially recognise July 22, instead of August 31, which was the date the Federation of Malaya received its in independence in 1957.

He added that Sarawakians should know the significance of the July 22 independence day for their homeland two months before the formation of Malaysia on September 16 of the same year.

“July 22 should have been honoured long ago but somehow the date was overshadowed by August 31, which has nothing to do with us.

“The date of Sarawak’s independence must be put in the correct perspective for the younger generations to understand. For historical purposes, let the young people know. We have to get the facts right,” Masing was quoted as saying by Borneo Post.

He also supports the Sarawak United People’s Party’s (SUPP) call on chief minister Tan Sri Adenan Satem to declare July 22 as Hari Sarawak.

“July 22 should have been honoured long ago but somehow the date was overshadowed by August 31, which has nothing to do with us.

“The date of Sarawak’s independence must be put in the correct perspective for the younger generations to understand. For historical purposes, let the young people know. We have to get the facts right,” Masing said, according to the Borneo Post.

He added that his hope is for all Sarawakians to be proud of the fact that Sarawak was already an independent nation prior to the formation of Malaysia as an equal partner with Singapore, North Borneo (Sabah) and the Federation of Malaya.

On the issue of declaring July 22 a public holiday in the state, Masing believes it is not as important as the whole state recognising the date as Sarawak’s day of independence.

“Let us settle this at another time. Maybe later on, as this is not an urgent matter at the moment. After all, when the state officially recognised Malaysia Day on September 16, there had never been a public holiday.

"More importantly, I am very pleased that the state government has been honouring July 22  for the last two years,” he was quoted as saying by the Borneo Post. – July 23, 2015.

Source: http://www.themalaysianinsider.com/malaysia/article/sarawak-leader-says-july-22-more-important-for-state-than-august-31#sthash.uUJOH3gr.dpuf

Anifah, Jeffrey deserve total support for raising Sabah rights and issues - ex CM

KOTA KINABALU: Foreign Minister Datuk Anifah Aman and STAR Sabah chief, Datuk Dr Jeffrey Kitingan have been hailed for fighting for Sabah’s rights, especially the “40 per cent entitlement” for the state.

Former Chief Minister, Datuk Yong Teck Lee said it is only now after 52 years of federal budgets that the "entitlement" has been successfully brought to the mainstream of Malaysian policy making. 

“The brilliance of Dr. Jeffrey in discovering this anomaly, and the courage of Anifah Aman to take this up all the way to the Prime Minister, deserve our recognition, said Yong in a statement Wednesday.

“Anifah is taking great risks offending UMNO, and the Prime Minister. He might even lose his job over this claim and other Sabah rights, and as such, both leaders deserve Sabahans' support in the fight for our rights.”

Responding to remarks by yet another ex chief minister, Tan Sri Harris Mohd Salleh’s remark that there’s no need for a committee to look into the payment of the entitlement, Yong countered: 

“I ask, Tan Sri Harris, are you not a Sabahan too?”

“Where Harris, myself and other previous Chief Ministers did not succeed, we should now help the new generation of Sabahans to do so. I believe that none of the ex-Sabah Chief Ministers and ex-Finance Ministers had known about this "40 per cent" proviso in the federal constitution. 

“To know and not do anything would have been wrong. The question now is what will the current Sabah government and our Sabahan federal ministers do about it?

Yong, the Sabah Progressive Party president said he agreed with Harris that other aspects of Sabah rights should also be looked at. 

“For a start, Harris could use his influence to seek the return of Labuan and federal agencies to Sabah, to get FELDA to hand over its 200,000 acres of land to settlers, tighten immigration into Sabah, increase oil royalties for Sabah and secure Sabah rights over the newly discovered oil and gas at ESSZONE,” Yong asserted.

He also quipped that Harris should not be cursed for failing to claim the "entitlement", citing that there have been six Prime Ministers, nine federal finance ministers, 13 Sabah Chief Ministers and nine Sabah Finance ministers who also “missed” the fact. 

“And there have been countless officers at the Attorney General Chambers and finance ministries at both state and federal levels responsible for drawing up the budgets,” he added.

Yong said he could give his best input and risk being criticised and it mattered not that his term as Chief Minister 17 years ago was for two out of 52 years, but now that an anomaly has been discovered, everything possible should be done to right it.

He reiterated that with the federal government now dependent on Sabah and Sarawak, a window of opportunity exists for the Borneo states to redress the injustices of the past.

Source: http://kinabalutoday.com/index.php/home-2/local-news/10051-anifah-jeffrey-deserve-total-support-for-raising-sabah-rights-and-issues-ex-cm

 
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...