Kerajaan Persekutuan mencuri hasil Sabah

Mereka sanggup mereka cerita dan memujuk pemimpin Sabah untuk menerima bayaran tunai sebanyak 5 peratus.

KOTA KINABALU: Pemimpin Malaysia tidak mempunyai asas undang-undang untuk menyatakan bahawa sumber minyak yang terletak di luar pantai Sabah adalah milik kerajaan persekutuan.

Menurut Ketua STAR Sabah, Datuk Dr Jeffrey Kitingan, pendedahan Tan Sri Majid Khan bahawa minyak hanya terdapat di pantai milik Sabah jelas membuktikan bahawa pemimpin persekutuan dari Malaya “mencuri” minyak dan sumber gas Sabah.

Katanya,mereka sanggup mereka cerita dan memujuk pemimpin Sabah untuk menerima bayaran tunai sebanyak 5 peratus.

“Apabila Tun Datu Mustapha dan Tun Fuad Stephens  (gambar) enggan menandatangani perjanjian dengan Petronas maka kosnpirasi dibuat supaya berlakunya kemalangan kapalterbang yang dinaiki Fuad pada petang 6 Jun 1976,” dakwa beliau sebagai mengulas cerita terpendam yang dibentangkan oleh Majid Khan pada forum baru-baru ini “The Formation of Malaysia – The Untold Story” yang dianjurkan oleh Persatuan Sabah.

Majid turut menambah bahawa apa yang dikatakan benar atau sah adalah perkara yang lain dan ia terpulang kepada rakyat Sabah hadir untuk membawa perkara itu ke mahkamah untuk menentukan kesahihan itu.

Perlembagaan Persekutuan 1963 memperuntukkan bahawa wilayah Sabah sebagai wilayah yang terkandung di dalamnya sebaik sebelum Hari Malaysia pada 16 September 1963 merupakan sempadan antarabangsa 1954.

Petronas telah ditubuhkan pada tahun 1974, empat daripada 19 telaga minyak di Sabah dan Sarawak sudah mengeluarkan kira-kira 99,000 tong sehari.

Sumber petroleum di Sabah termasuk pelesenan dan pungutan royalti sebagai hasil Sabah datang dalam lingkungan Seksyen 24 Ordinan Tanah Sabah (Bab 68) yang telah diluluskan pada tahun 1930, dahulu sebelum pembentukan Malaysia.

Di bawah Perkara 74 Perlembagaan Persekutuan, perkara-perkara tanah yang termasuk sumber petroleum datang dalam kuasa Senarai Negeri dalam Jadual 9. Permit dan lesen untuk mencari gali untuk lombong, pajakan perlombongan dan sijil juga datang dalam lingkungan Senarai Negeri dalam Jadual 9.

Dr Jeffrey menegaskan bahawa Parlimen Malaysia tidak mempunyai hak menggubal undang-undang perniagaan Akta Pembangunan Petroleum (PDA) 1974 apabila perkara-perkara yang datang dalam lingkungan Senarai Negeri dalam Jadual 9.

“PDA adalah undang-undang perlembagaan tidak bernilai, namun, ia masih digunakan untuk menyedut kira 95% daripada minyak Sabah dan sumber gas sehingga hari ini tanpa bantahan daripada pemimpin-pemimpin BN Sabah,” katanya.

Katanya lagi, Allahyarham Tun Razak tidak mempunyai kuasa undang-undang dan tidak mempunyai bidang kuasa ke atas minyak dan gas di Sabah apabila beliau secara tidak sah dan menyalahi undang-undang yang ditandatangani Perintah Letak Hak pada 27 Mac 1975 pemberian minyak Sabah dan sumber gas kepada Petronas.

“Kehilangan royalti akan menjadi antara 12% hingga 30% jika angka yang diberikan oleh Tengku Razaleigh sebagai kayu pengukur untuk pergi. Royalti 30% kepada RM18 bilion yang dikutip oleh Petronas keseluruhan kepada kerajaan Sabah merupakan tambahan RM5.4 bilion dalam pendapatan tambahan pada tahun 2012 kepada RM3.7 bilion hasil bajet negeri dikumpulkan dalam negara.” tegas beliau.

Tambahnya lagi, seperti yang dinasihatkan oleh Majid, hari ini bola kini berada di kaki rakyat Sabah untuk mengambil isu pemilikan dan perkongsian hasil minyak Sabah dan sumber gas.

“Pemimpin BN Sabah tidak boleh diharapkan untuk meneruskan perkara itu terutama apabila Ketua Menteri telah memberikan petunjuk kepada pemimpin-pemimpin yang lain untuk berdiam diri apabila beliau berkata bahawa tidak ada semakan segera pembayaran minyak dari Petronas,” dakwanya lagi.

Source: http://www.freemalaysiatoday.com/category/nation/2013/09/17/kerajaan-persekutuan-mencuri-hasil-sabah/

Read More

Debat untuk meraih populariti?

Hasil debat bukan boleh memajukan Sabah dan Sarawak, malah memecah belahkan masyarakat.

KUCHING: Pembentukan Malaysia mula diragui oleh warga Sabah dan Sarawak malah wujudnya kumpulan nasionalis menghangatkan lagi pentas politik negara.

Debat terbuka antara wakilKetua Menteri Sarawak iaitu Idris Buang, ahli tertinggi parti Pesaka Bumiputera Bersatu (PBB) dengan kumpulan aktivis facebook mendapat reaksi panas di laman sosial.

Ada yang memberi reaksi positif dan negatif mengenai debat terbuka tersebut.

“Hasil debat bukan boleh memajukan Sabah dan Sarawak, malah memecah belahkan masyarakat. Beliau boleh berdebat kerana beliau berkuasa,” ujar Sengapa Rembang, orang awam yang memberi pandangan mengenai isu ini.

“Jika beliau mahu berdebat, kita cabar beliau pergi bersemuka atau tolong kaum Penan di Murum, “Beliau cuma mahu tumpang populariti untuk menjadi calon pilihan raya negeri yang akan tiba tidak lama lagi,” tegas beliau

Seperti yang sedia maklum, laporan FMT kelmarin menyiarkan pencabar Idris iaitu penulis blog, pentadbir halaman dan kumpulan aktivis facebook seperti Sabah Sarawak Keluar Malaysia (SSKM), Sarawak Sovereignty Movement (SSM) dan The Future of Sabah/Sarawak serta Sabah Sarawak Federation (SSF).

Idris, dalam menerima cabaran melalui posting Facebook, berkata individu-individu dan kumpulan terbabit telah “menghasut rakyat Sabah dan Sarawak untuk merdeka dari Malaysia malah menyifatkan mereka sebagai ‘ancaman’.

Sementara itu, pentadbir halaman SSKM, Doris Jones, sebagai pengamal undang-undang di Britain menambah sebagai seorang yang bekerja di Mahkamah (contohnya Mahkamah keadilan untuk para legal) tidak akan berdebat melalui media sosial.

“Saya pernah terlibat dalam perdebatan awam secara langsung, tetapi pertamanya melalui kaedah-kaedah yang anda tahu dengan baik,

“Notis perlu diberikan terlebih dahulu kepada semua panel,

“Kita sebagai pentadbir di SSKM tidak hanya mahu meletakkan kumpulan kami sebagai persaingan kepada mana-mana kumpulan lain Borneo. Itu bukan dasar kami di semua.” tegas beliau

Seperti dalam laporan FMT, menteri-menteri di Sarawak pula berbelah bahagi dengan keputusan menyemak semula Perjanjian Malaysia.

Menteri Pembangunan Tanah, Datuk James Masing dipetik akhbar tempatan berkata, Persekutuan Malaysia dan kedudukan Sarawak harus dikaji semula.

Sementara itu, Timbalan Menteri Dalam Negeri, Datuk Wan Junaidi memberi amaran kepada pemimpin parti supaya jangan membangkitkan isu Perjanjian Malaysia.

Source: http://www.freemalaysiatoday.com/category/nation/2013/11/29/debat-untuk-meraih-populariti/

Read More

Rising Borneo consciousness among S’wak bloggers

Sabah Star chairman Jeffrey Kitingan said the rise of political consciousness in Sarawak augured well for Borneo.

KUCHING: Over 50 bloggers here met with Sabah assemblyman Jeffrey Kitingan to brainstorm over existing issues affecting the two Borneo states.

Topping their discussions were the federal government’s defaults on the Malaysia Agreement and the insidious ‘amendments’ to the federal constitution and Malaya’s ‘occupation’ of Sabah and Sarawak’s natural resources.

Since the historic 2008 general election and the subsequent 2011 state elections in Sarawak, political awareness has seen an increasing presence in the blogsphere.

In the run-up to last May’s general elections, Kitingan was the voice Sarawakians heard brandishing the 20 and 18 points agreements involving Sabah and Sarawak.

Speaking to FMT here, Kitingan said the rise of political awareness in Sarawak especially among the younger generation was a sign of ‘emerging times’.

He said the emergence of new groups such as the Sabah Sarawak Movement (SSM), Sabah Sarawak Keluar Malaysia (SSKM), United Varsity Student of Borneo (UVSB) showed that the people of Sabah and Sarawak were desperately wanting to express their concerns.

Both SSM and SSKM are active on social media and have 7,742 and nearly 10,000 members respectively.

“It’s a sign of emerging times. People are beginning to question the state’s position as the 12th and 13th state in Malaysia when this is not the reality.

“That these questions are being asked indicates that we have a problem that needs to be addressed,” Kitingan said.

Amendments to federal constitution

He said in 1963 independent sovereigns Sabah and Sarawak went into partnership with the Federation of Malaya as equals.

“The Federation was formed through 20 points and 18 points conditions, among them were  important promises to Sabah and Sarawak that they will be self-governing.

“As equal partners Sabah and Sarawak were assured that we will have the power to control our resources and finances and political franchise.

“But today it is no longer that and we find ourselves (Sabah and Sarawak) degraded to be just be one of state.

“It has been a project takeover for Malaya,” said Kitingan.

He pointed out that the federal constitution had been surreptitiously amended “around 1975 and 1976” to “totally change the concept of Malaysia”.

“The amendments turned Sabah and Sarawak into the 12th and 13th state. It was a takeover of  British colonies.

“And now we are colonized by Malaya especially Sabah,” he said adding that Sarawak had managed to preserve its independence to some extend because of Chief Minister Taib Mahmud.

Senior leaders in the Taib-run administration have in recent months also openly accused the Umno-led federal authorities of shortchanging Borneo and have gone as far as to call for a review of the current situation.

Meanwhile Taib’s firm stand on the ‘status quo’ of the Malaysia Agreement and the state government’s endorsement of Sarawak’s Independence Day on July 23 last year augurs well for Borneo sentiments.

Source: http://www.freemalaysiatoday.com/category/nation/2014/01/28/rising-borneo-consciousness-among-swak-bloggers/

Read More

Orang Sarawak mengecam campur tangan luar

Tindakan membelakangkan Perjanjian Malaysia 1963 mengemukakan memorandum membantah Taib jadi TYT tidak wajar.

KUCHING: Rakyat Sarawak tidak menyokong campur tangan orang luar dalam hal ehwal politik di negeri itu.

Tindakan PAS dan PKR yang mengemukakan memorandum kepada Yang di Pertuan Agong dan Majlis Raja-raja (MRR) supaya menangguhkan perlantikan Tan Sri Abdul Taib Mahmud sebagai Tuan Yang di Pertua (TYT)  yang baru mendapat reaksi negatif daripada orang ramai.

Aktivis Sabah Sarawak Keluar Malaysia (SSKM), Abdul Halim Hamdian menyifatkan tindakan Pakatan Rakyat (PR) seperti mengambil kesempatan menceroboh urusan pentadbiran negeri ini.

“Kalau betul PR benar-benar menyuarakan hak rakyat Sarawak, mereka perlu mempersoalkan kenapa gelaran ‘Yang Dipertua Negeri’ menggantikan istilah ‘Gabenor’?

“Tindakan mereka sedaya upaya membelakangkan hak perlembagaan yang termaktub dalam Perjanjian Malaysia 1963 dengan membawa Majlis Raja-raja untuk masuk campur dalam urusan pelantikan TYT yang baru,

“Mereka fikir taraf Gabenor Sarawak ini sama dengan YDP Pulau Pinang dan YDP Melaka dalam konteks ini?

Halim berkata tindakan luar biasa PR ini cuma untuk meraih populariti.

Sementara itu Sheldon Edgar berkata tindakan PR ini sebagai tindakan balas dendam menjatuhkan Taib.

“Kenapa tidak cari kesalahan menteri-menteri yang lain di Malaya (Malaysia) secara khusus dan kenapa perlu nak jaga tepi kain Sarawak?

“Selagi Taib masih memegang pucuk pimpinan, selagi itu mereka susah nak masuk Sarawak.” tegas beliau.

Idris Bin Wahhid pula menambah: “Apasal PAS sama PKR goyang jika Taib jadi TYT?”

Sementara itu, Agong dan MRR sehingga kini belum memberi apa-apa reaksi mengenai isu Taib.

Source: http://www.freemalaysiatoday.com/category/nation/2014/02/22/orang-sarawak-mengecam-campur-tangan-luar/

Read More

Ulang tahun kemerdekaan Sarawak disambut meriah

Kerajaan masih belum ada cadangan mengisytiharkan 22 Julai sebagai cuti umum.

KUCHING: Sambutan perayaan ulang tahun ke 51 Sarawak merdeka daripada empayar British disambut meriah walaupun tiada sambutan seluruh negeri yang dilakukan oleh kerajaan negeri pada Selasa lepas.

Sambutan ulang tahun ke-51 tahun Sarawak merdeka dimulakan dengan “Sarawak Independent Walk” yang dianjurkan oleh Jawatankuasa 722 2014 pada 19 Julai dibawah Sarawak People’s Aspirations (SAPA) dan beberapa badan bukan kerajaan (NGO) turut hadir memberi sokongan serta sekitar 100 orang turut hadir.

Pada 20 Julai pula, acara yang sama turut dilakukan di Miri dibawah Hornbill Talks, halaman Facebook, dan disokong oleh syarikat persendirian. Sekitar 100 lebih peserta mengambil bahagian.

Sementara itu, pada 22 Julai Persatuan Graduan Melayu Sarawak (IGMS) juga mengadakan lakonan semula peristiwa bersejarah yang membawa Sarawak menjadi sebuah negara yang berdaulat dan membentuk kerajaan sendiri 51 tahun yang lalu.

Walaupun di sebalik kegemilangan dan majlis bagaimanapun, Presiden IGMS Anib Said bimbang kepentingan di sebalik peristiwa bersejarah yang telah disalahgunakan oleh orang luar untuk melanjutkan agenda politik mereka sendiri, ada yang termasuk pengembalian pemerintahan British dan Brooke.

“Kami tidak cuba untuk memaksa referendum ke atas Malaysia,” katanya kepada pemberita pagi ini.

Terdapat juga perarakan yang dilakukan pihak awam yang dikenali sebagai #PH227 sebuah gerakan awam yang mengadakan perarakan merdeka pada jam 10 pagi sehingga 12 tengah hari dan mereka juga turut menuntut kerajaan negeri mengisytiharkan 22 Julai sebagai cuti umum.

100 peserta lebih dilaporkan turut hadir memberi sokongan.

Penduduk di Bintulu juga turut mengadakan perarakan awam yang dilakukan pada sebelah malam dan sekitar 100 lebih juga peserta memberi sokongan.

Pada 22 Julai 1963, Sarawak telah diberi kemerdekaan oleh pihak British

Menteri Pembangunan Tanah, James Jemut Masing berkata buat masa ini kerajaan masih belum ada cadangan mengisytiharkan 22 Julai sebagai cuti umum.

Kerajaan negeri turut meraikannya sebagai sebuah acara rasmi kerajaan dengan Majlis Memperingati 22 Julai & Penghargaan Sambutan Perayaan 50 Tahun Sarawak Merdeka Dalam Malaysia pada malam Isnin.

Pada 22 Julai 1963, Sarawak telah diberi kemerdekaan oleh pihak British sebelum membentuk Persekutuan Malaysia pada 16 September 1963.

Source: http://www.freemalaysiatoday.com/category/nation/2014/07/25/ulang-tahun-kemerdekaan-sarawak-disambut-meriah/

Read More

Punca Ugutan Keras Tuntutan Facebook Sabah Sarawak Keluar Malaysia. Apa Kata Rakyat Malaysia?

Terlebih dahulu, pihak SSKM ingin MENAFIKAN dan MENYANGKAL akan tindakan keterlibatan membakar bendera "malaysia/malaya" ini. Pembakaran bendera ini sebenarnya dilakukan oleh bangsa Filipina di Manila sebagai tunjuk perasaan menentang tindakan kerajaan "malaysia" semasa insiden pencerobohan pengganas di Tanduo, Lahad Datu Sabah.

Sesungguhnya pihak beritasemasa (Punca Ugutan Keras Tuntutan Facebook Sabah Sarawak Keluar Malaysia. Apa Kata Rakyat Malaysia?) ingin timbulkan prasangka negatif dan provokatif untuk mencemarkan imej pihak SSKM dalam usaha untuk mendidikan Bangsa Negara Sabah dan Bangsa Negara Sarawak tentang kebenaran yang selama ini disembunyikan oleh kerajaan persekutuan malaysia/malaya selama ini. Apa yang diperjuangkan oleh pihak SSKM adalah apa yang sebenarnya diinginkan oleh majoriti bangsa Negara Sabah dan Negara Sarawak.

Selama 51 tahun Bangsa Negara Sabah dan Bangsa Negara Sarawak memberikan peluang kepada pemimpin malaya untuk memperbetulkan keadaan namun, semakin diberi, semakin mereka menindas dan terus menipu. Perkara yang lebih menyedihkan apabila kerajaan malaya terus memperbodohkan diri tentang hak kesamarataan Negara Sabah dan Negara Sarawak dengan persekutuan tanah melayu/malaya. Mereka telah mengangkat diri mereka sebagai tuan kepada Kerajaan Negara Sabah dan Negara Sarawak. Dan ini sesuatu yang TIDAK BOLEH DIMAAFKAN!

Pihak SSKM berharap agar penyokong Kebangsaan Negara Sabah dan Kebangsaan Negara Sarawak tidak termakan penipuan yang cuba dilakukan oleh pihak beritasemasa melalui gambar tersebut. Pihak SSKM percaya bahawa Bangsa Negara Sabah dan Bangsa Negara Sarawak tidak akan tertipu dengan teknik kotor ini kerana kini adalah zaman Teknologi Maklumat.

Read More

How Malaysian Acedemic guide Sabahan & Sarawakian in history

They hide the truth about our history...
They tell lie about our history...
They proclaim themselves as the Superior to us...
They are nothing but a bunch of Liars...

They are colonizing us mentally, physically, socially, economically and politically...
They has ruin our hope and future...
They fool us and manipulate our Leaders...
They are nothing but a bunch of uncivilized nation...

Read More

Another word - Secession is our right.

Another word - Secession is our right.

=====================

Point 7: Right of Secession

There should be no right to secede from the Federation.

======================

We should take a positive view of the "no right to secede" initiative, which is worth considering despite its affirmation in Point 7 which speaks of the Sabahan and Sarawakian rights to secede from the Federation of Malaysia This is so because “the use [by Point 7] of the word ‘’should’ (as opposed to the word ‘shall,’ for example) turns the option of "NO RIGHT TO SECEDE" into a mere recommendation.”

You see.. Diplomatic documents often demand close linguistic analysis. Would that Point 7 have meant something else, had it said that “There SHALL be no right to secede from the Federation.”?

Since the auxiliary verbs “shall” and “shan’t” have all but disappeared from American English, in much of Great Britain they are still in common use. The facts that the 18/20 Points Agreement was an Agreement relating to Malaysia between United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, Federation of Malaya, North Borneo, Sarawak and Singapore, it’s British usage that counts — and when it comes to that, what greater authorities do we have than the estimable Fowler brothers, F.G. and H.W., whose “The King’s English” (first edition published by Oxford University Press, 1906) served generations of perplexed English speakers as a revered guide. Here’s what “The King’s English” (traditionally known as “Fowler”) has to say about “shall,” “should,” “will” and “would” in a discussion that is 20(!) pages long:

“It is unfortunate that the idiomatic use [of these words], while it comes by nature to southern Englishmen (who will find most of this section superfluous), is so complicated that those who are not to the manner born can hardly acquire it; and for them [this] section is in danger of being useless. In apology for the length of the remarks it must be said that the short and simple directions often given are worse than useless. The observant reader soon loses faith in them… and the unobservant is the victim of false security."

Needless to say, this is highly reassuring! Fowler then opens its discussion with the following short and simple directions: “Roughly speaking, should follows the same rules as shall, and would as will.”

In their pure form, Fowler continues, "shall" and "should" express command or obligation, whereaswill and would express intention or prediction, the difference between the two members of each pair being that the second is the conditional form of the first. Hence, “There SHALL be no right to secede from the Federation.” would indicate that Sabah & Sarawak is commanded NOT TO SECEDE FROM THE FEDERATION unconditionally, whereas “There SHOULD be no right to secede from the Federation.” indicates that this command is SUBJECT TO A CONDITION (or CONDITIONS) — in this case, presumably, that SABAHAN & SARAWAKIAN wish “to continue being part of the Federation”

Would such a reading of my argument, if it is the correct one, turn POINT 7 into a “mere recommendation” that SABAH & SARAWAK continue to be part of the Federation of Malaysia when there is no reasons/causes to trigger their need to SECEDE FROM THE FEDERATION?? If POINT 7 intends to say that SABAH & SARAWAK need not secede from the Federation unless it wants to, then it also intends to say that SABAH & SARAWAK need not continue to be part of the Federation of Malaysia unless it wants to — a construction of POINT 7 that would be rather bizarre, to say the least.

True, in practice, as opposed to theory, the difference between “shall” and “should” in British English is somewhat different: “shall” often expressing a COMMAND on the speaker’s part, and “should” merely a DESIRE, as in “You shall go to the doctor” vs. “You should go to the doctor.” And yet if we paraphrase POINT 7 as saying, “The Point 7 of the Agreement of Malaysia desires that Sabah & Sarawak not to secede from the Federation,” is this significantly better for Sabah & Sarawak? How big an improvement over flouting the POINT 7’s command would be flouting the POINT 7’s desire??

In short, if we take consideration of the above arguments on the reading of POINT 7, the FEDERATION OF MALAYSIA should politely be told in the king’s English, “No, thank you.. we SABAHAN & SARAWAKIAN wish to SECEDE from the Federation.”

Read More

The Making of the Federation of Malaysia...

Please read this book and you will understand the process of making "The Federation of Malaysia." Written by a British Professor. All thesecret communication between the British Government and Malaya Government has been exposed through this book. Share this book if you cares! And once you realise, do support us to spread this awareness and encourage the Sabahan and Sarawakian to sign the petition. Here is the link (http://www.gopetition.com/petitions/sabah-sarawak-rights.html) of the petition that we will bring to InternationalCourt of Justice (ICJ).

***PLEASE DOWNLOAD AND SPREAD THIS PDF BOOK AS MANY AS YOU CAN BEFORE THIS BOOK BE REMOVE AGAIN. FOR SABAH AND SARAWAK***

The Making of The Federation of Malaysia by Doris Jones

Read More

Masa Depan Negara Sabah dan Negara Sarawak Pasti Berubah!

Kepada Rakyat Bangsa Negara Sabah dan Negara Sarawak... Suatu ketika dahulu "gagasan malaysia" merupakan satu cerita dongeng, cerita khabar angin sahaja tetapi telah menjadi satu kenyataan dengan harapan memberikan bahawa masa depan bangsa Negara North Borneo (Sabah) dan Negara Sarawak akan cerah. Tapi lihatlah sekarang, adakah kita merasai nikmat tersebut? Ada, iaitu penindasan, diskriminasi, penipuan, ugutan dan bermacam-macam lagi. Maka sekarang tibalah masanya untuk kita jadikan ini sebagai satu kenyataan yang PASTI! Bagaimana? Tunjukkan sokongan anda dengan menyebarkan gambar ini...

Ia sudah cukup jelas memberikan satu mesej bahawa INI BAKAL DAN PASTI TERJADI! IA PASTI MENJADI KENYATAAN! Seperti mana malaysia menjadi kenyataan, begitu jugalah Republic of North Borneo (Sabah) dan Kingdom of Sarawak/Republic of Sarawak menjadi kenyataan... Biarlah malaya dengan nama barunya itu malaysia... Adakah anda kisah dengan nama itu? Biarlah mereka dengan nama negara malaysia. Sebarkan mesej ini...

Read More

SSKM 18/20 Points Spot Awareness Programme

SPECIAL REPORT

A hectic evening with SSKM 18/20 Points Spot Awareness Programme started at Mukah Old Township located at The New Lane Restaurant and later at The Setia Raja Food Court area followed by The Setia Raja Commercial Area. It was a fun spot discussion to gauge the peoples' knowledge about the GENUINE HISTORY of Sarawak and Sabah and The Formation of Malaysia and the Sarawak/Sabah CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS within Federation of Malaysia altogether. This is simply a gathering of people ranging from university students, professionals, social activist and others with the essence of 18/20 Points. A lite but energetic discussion as well as interactive Q & A about Sarawak/Sabah National Identity has bring us a lot of information to push us as Sarawakian and Sabahan citizens forward for the sake of the NEW SARAWAK and SABAH.

The THREE DAYS SPOT AWARENESS EXERCISE proves that the genuine information has reach certain level i.e. Masjids, Churches and Temples all around Dalat, Mukah, Sibu and Daro and other. While another location like various kampongs, recreational parks and even pubs and cafes were not left behind and yes, the awareness is SPROUTING.

This is still a small part of it and still a very long journey ahead. Thanks to SSKM (Sabah Sarawak Keluar Malaysia) Group for KICKSTARTING the LONG TERM Public Awareness Initiatives since 2011, from Kuching to Kota Kinabalu, from Kuala Lumpur to Singapore, From London to New York we will together move forward for the better future of our Nations, Negara Sabah and Negara Sarawak.

Speech by SSKM Administrator, Abdul Halim and assisted by Mr. Sim Totti and materials (the Flag) by Mr. Beng Kor of Sarawak Sovereignty Movement and car sticker by Sarawak Sovereignty Movement. Thanks to all who make this to happen and see you next in another cities for SSKM 18/20 Points Spot Awareness Programme!

The Petition Signing ended our program before we disperse.

(Pictures from the courtesy of Sim Totti & Mohamad Dzulkarnainx)

~Let Us Together Rebuild Our Nations~

DUM SPIRO SPERO | PERGO ET PERAGO

Read More

The Coming Republic of Sabah (North Borneo) and Republic of Sarawak!

We are not giving an empty talk. We work it out by spreading the awareness about the truth! The truth that has been hide by the government of malaya/malaysia. We seek justice through the International Court of Justice (ICJ) but before we can proceed to that stage, we need to ensure that every Sabahan and Sarawakian understand about why we must and have to proceed to such action. We expose everything, nothing less but the truth and many more will coming soon via our online Facebook page. Other page also can be found through Facebook page "The Future Sabah/Sarawak and The Federation of Malaysia". Your support is our strength! Give us the support to pursue this struggle and walk with us as a Truly Nationalist of Borneo, Sabah and Sarawak!

Show your support by helping us to collect the signature to be fill in our online petition. Please CLICK HERE TO SIGN THE PETITION. Thank you

Read More

Support us... SSKM!

WE ARE NON PARTISAN GROUP OR AFFILIATED TO OTHER POLITICAL PARTIES and also please take note for those who are new member (s) please use your real picture for 1st week; so we know who you are in real world.

BORNEO GREETINGS TO ALL ~~

Sabah and Sarawak has been governed under the current Administration since

1963. That was the year Malaysia was born and sadly, that was a new

beginning of political slavery that took place in these two promising lands. Sabah and Sarawak were seen and mentioned by the current Administration as their

deposits which they gain in terms of political "interest" during Election time has taken their natives, people and produce for granted.

Such blessed soil that produces crops such as Palm Oil and Rubber should have converted into massive developments for the locals in both States especially when the commodity prices escalates over the years. However, the sad and horrible Truth is that the People were left and abandon from further developments. Education systems that continue to sup pres the creativity minds of the people in fear that the future generations might wake up one day to fight for what was theirs in the very FIRST PLACE. The SALCRA programs for both States were designed to keep generations of natives and locals as their working horse while they cash in by making millions individually. Individuals gain immeasurable wealth at the expense of these ignorant and innocent people. The current NEP system and policies have given birth to a crippled nation in these two States.

We are here to provide a platform for anyone who wishes to share and provide timely information on why Sabah and Sarawak should have its Independence. Their inclusion into Malaya in 1963, were due to the generosity by the British Government. (The Brookes family seceded Sarawak to British in 1948). By right, these two States were not for anyone to give it to Malaya. Let us criticize or suggest constructively on how and why these two deserving States should have its own Government.

Read More

Unrest and Upheavel - Colonial Rule in Sarawak

Sarawak Flag as Crown Colony

By 1950 it was clear that the Colonial Office was failing to control the recently created Crown Colony of Sarawak. The ceding of the kingdom by Rajah Charles Brooke broke the 1941 constitution as the Council Negri (parliament) and people were all too aware. They denounced the cynical manner in which their independance had been traded for money and demanded an end to colonial control through the restoration to the throne of the White Rajahs through the person of Anthony Walter Dayrell Brooke, the nephew of Charles and Rajah Muda (Heir) of Sarawak. 

They felt he was capable - having run the country for a year - of governing it without any Westminister interferance. Many in the local civil service agreed and used their positions to undermine the new authorities - they distributed posters and organised opposition wherever possible. People in the countryside displayed their loyalties by flying the pre-colonial flag or through other prominant referances to the old regime.

A nationalist showing their support of the Brooke's by painting the Royal Crest on their door. During the time of the Crown Colony a fine was imposed on those who did this and the crest hastily painted over, as such this example is a rare survivor.

Abang Haji Abdillah : The Gandhi of Sarawak

History is often made by extraordinary people and one of those must surely be Abang Haji Abdillah, the son of the late mayor of Kuching he was both an ardent nationalist and a powerful orator. Called the "Sarawak Gandhi" he followed a similar path of peaceful pass protest and non - violent demostration. [1] Through powerful speeches such as "Me and my people would never agree with the cession of Sarawak to the British  Crown!...We cherish the independence of this state where we were born..." he raised the spirits of the people and brought coverage to the plight of Sarawak. Supporters of him took part in hunger strikes and prevented colonial officials from entering their villages. His persona was crucial to uniting the Dayaks and Malays behind the Brooke claim and preserving their close realtionship against Colonial Office divide and conquer techniques.

DUM SPIRO SPERO | PERGO ET PERAGO

Article credit to Xhavnak

Read More

Mahathir MENJAHANAM Negara Sabah!

Komenter Pertama

Tindakan Mahathir mengakui Projek IC itu berlaku adalah disebabkan dia tidak mampu lagi untuk berselindung daripada salahlaku atas tindakan pemberian IC secara haram itu yang mana ia telah dihalalkan dan diluluskan melalui agensi JPN. 

Terlalu banyak orang yang menjadi saksi atas perbuatannya yang terkutuk. Kini dia sedang mencari alasan untuk menampakkan tindakannya itu sesuatu yang tidak salah dan sah disisi undang-undang. 

Wahai saudara saudari sekalian... Dia sedang menggunakan alasan mengenai pemberian 1 juta kerakyatan di Malaya untuk di samakan di Sabah. Perlu diingat bahawa sejarah pemberian kerakyatan itu sungguh jauh sekali tujuannya. 

Pemberian IC di Malaya itu dilakukan sebelum malaya mencapai kemerdekaan yang mana ia merupakan satu tindakan yang sah disisi undang-undang melalui prinsip kerakyatan jus soli. Atas persetujuan (antara syarat-syarat pra kemerdekaan) itulah baru Malaya diberikan kemerdekaan.

Berlainan pula isu pemberian kerakyatan di Sabah. Ia dilakukan bukan untuk kemerdekaan tetapi adalah bermotifkan politik 100% untuk mengukuhkan parti-parti malaya dibawah pimpinan parti umno-bn. Mahathir menegaskan bahawa dia mengikuti lunas undang-undang dalam pemberian ic tetapi apakah yang dia gunakan sebagai panduan dalam pemberian ic tersebut? Adakah apabila orang asing itu pandai bercakap bahasa "melayu" dan "islam" terus menjadi Malaysia??? adakah mereka ini sudah mencapai permaustatin tetap selama 12 tahun (minimum)? Setahu saya, pemberian ic ini sangat canggih. Sekarang orang asing itu sampai sabah, kelmarin lagi ic itu sudah siap untuk mereka. Apa lagi alasan yang digunakan olehnya??? 

Inilah yang terjadi jikalau orang asing (bapanya adalah orang india di kerala) yang telah diberikan kerakyatan dibenarkan menjadi pemimpin. Hasilnya adalah seperti yang anda dapat lihat daripada kerja dia selama bergelar pemimpin Malaysia/malaya

Saya ingin menyeru kepada semua Warga Sabah, Bangsa yang Merdeka dan Berdaulat untuk berdiri teguh dalam isu ini dan menentang tindakannya habis-habisan yang kotor dan sungguh menjijikkan agar keselamatan dan kesejahteraan Negara kita Sabah dipelihara selamanya!

Komenter Kedua

Tun Mahathir berkata bahawa Tunku juga melakukan perkara yang sama malah lebih teruk jika dibandingkan dengan apa yang dia buat. Jika kita kaji semula perlembagaan persekutuan, apa yang dilakukan oleh Tunku Abdul Rahman adalah SAH disisi undang-undang kerana kewujudan KONTRAK SOSIAL bagi menggantikan konsep Jus Soli yang menafikan hak dan keistimewaan orang Melayu dan Bumiputera (Bumiputera di sini tidak termasuk Natives of Sarawak dan Natives of Sabah atau dengan nama lain, Anak Negeri Pribumi Sarawak/Sabah; Natives of Sarawak & Natives of Sabah mempunyai hak dan keistimewaan yang sama di dalam Perlembagaan Persekutuan setaraf Melayu dan Bumiputera di Persekutuan Malaya).

Prinsip Jus Soli yang digunakan semasa Malayan Union tidak menjamin kemandirian orang orang Melayu dan Bumiputera di Malaya pada masa tersebut. Ini menimbulkan rasa tidak puas hati di kalangan orang melayu malaya. Maka, pewujudan Kontrak Sosial selari dengan pembentukan Persekutuan Malaya yang terdiri daripada Negeri-Negeri Melayu Bersekutu, Negeri-Negeri Melayu Tidak Bersekutu dan Negeri-Negeri Selat (States Without Ruler) yang menjamin hak dan keistimewaan Melayu dan bumiputera Negara Persekutuan Malaya di samping memelihara kebajikan masyarakat bukan Melayu dan bukan bumiputera iaitu masyarakat India dan Cina dan oleh kerana itu, pemberian IC kepada masyarakat India dan Cina pada masa itu adalah tertakluk kepada PERJANJIAN yang ditentukan di dalam Kontrak Sosial. Negara Persekutuan Tanah Malaya lahir secara rasmi pada 31 Ogos 1957 iaitu hari kemerdekaan Malaya (bukan kemerdekaan Malaysia).

Jika kita melihat praktik Kontrak Sosial ini hanya tergunapakai di Persekutuan Malaya (sekarang ini adalah Semenanjung Malaysia) sahaja. Kerangka tersebut tidak terguna pakai di Sabah kerana komposisi Negara Sabah sebelum pembentukan Persekutuan Malaysia pada 16 September 1963 adalah jauh berbeza dan Negara Sabah telah mempunyai Perlembagaan sendiri dan mempunyai identiti kenegaraan tersendiri. Maka tindakan Tun Mahathir mewajarkan pemberian IC kepada pendatang asing di Sabah bolehlah dianggap sebagai pengkhianatan terhadap kedaulatan Sabah yang telah "bersetuju" untuk membentuk Malaysia bersama Negara Sarawak, Negara Malaya dan Negara Singapura pada 50 tahun yang lampau.

Read More

18 dan 20 Perkara Negara Sarawak dan Negara Sabah

Siapa yang masih merasakan perkara 20/18 perjanjian malaysia hanyalah dimeja rundingan. Ini adalah bukti semuanya termaktub dalam perjanjian Malaysia 1963.

Fakta menarik: Perkara 7: hak untuk keluar dari persekutuan malaysia tiada termaktub dalam perjanjian ini dan hanya diungkit dimeja rundingan sahaja.

Read More

The Hidden of Malaya Agenda towards Borneo Territories In The Federation Proposal Back in 1961

Look and assess with yourself ... What is happening now is actually already became a reality that can not unquestionably ... Before the formation of the Federation of Malaysia, Borneo leaders have expressed their concern regarding the Borneo States' future if this Federation of Malaysia proceed but have been assured by leaders of Malaya that their anxiety is not true ... In reality, it's the opposite to what they've been assured previously. When looking at the situation now, it gives exactly the same message as before... We take an example about the issue of Lahad Datu.

Minister in the Prime Minister, Nazri said boastedly that the influx of PTI (illegal immigrant) is not a threaten national security for Sabah and Sabahan, and it was proved that he was totally wrong about it... Nightmare becames a reality and the Bornean have to bear the misery which was done by the "Federal Government of the Federation of Malaysia"... So now, open your eyes and your mind O Sabahan and Sarawakian! Take this responsibility to rise and fight for the Future State of Sabah and Sarawak State!! Change has arrived ... Do WAIT NO MORE!!! Today's Generation Must Be Responsible To Future Generations!!

Read More

SSKM's MOTIVATION

This is what keep us move forward and struggle for the sake of Borneo's Future in South East Asia and World. From the People, By the People and To the People we are fighting... Support us with all your heart and we appreciate your contribution. Let us do this for the Better Future of Sabah and Sarawak!

Read More