Wednesday, 11 March 2015
Wednesday, March 11, 2015
Agreement of Malaysia
,
Exposing the Truth
,
Fact
,
Federation of Malaysia 16 September 1963
,
History
,
News
,
Sabah
No comments
Bosi to move Bill to review position of Sabah in M'sia
Kota Kinabalu: Kapayan Assemblyman Dr Edwin Bosi has submitted a motion to move a Bill under Standing Order 23 and for the establishment of a Select Committee under Standing Order 91 to review the position of Sabah in Malaysia.
"I take leave to move an adjournment of the Assembly under Standing Order 23 for the purpose of discussing a review on the position of Sabah in Malaysia and the setting up of a Select Committee as per Standing Order 91 on this said Bill to be chaired by the Speaker which will be tabled during the Sabah Assembly sitting from April 9 to 16," he said in his letter handed to the State Assembly office on Monday.
Giving his justifications, Bosi said Sabah's position in Malaysia after 52 years of independence was imperative since the people were starting to be aware of its position in Malaysia.
"There is a general feeling that Sabah and Sabahans have been short-changed after 52 years of independence in Malaysia.
"The open and public remarks by Sarawak's new Chief Minister Tan Sri Adenan Satem on Sarawak's rights have more or less inspired the same sentiments in Sabah.
"Sabahans know that as long as Umno is dominant in the Sabah government and the Chief Minister is from Umno there is little chance to see open and public remarks from Sabah leaders and in particular from the Chief Minister to assert or to demand Sabah's rights in Malaysia.
"The existence of the Sabah Sarawak Keluar Malaysia (SSKM) movement is in fact the more bold and daring expression of unhappiness of the people of Sabah and Sarawak.
"Doris Jones who resides in the United Kingdom is a Sabahan and heads the SSKM movement.
"SSKM believes that there is no democracy in Sabah. There is no freedom of expression, association and of speech. That Malaya only wants to control and dictate what and how Sabahans should live and behave. SSKM therefore wants to see Sabah being an independent country like Brunei and Singapore," he said.
Bosi said that on Mar 7 2015, a forum on the formation of Malaysia was organised at Universiti Malaysia Sabah (UMS) and Foreign Minister Datuk Anifah Aman who was the moderator had asked for a detail and in-depth study on the issues raised.
Anifah had called on all State leaders to put aside their political differences and put their heads together to look into the rights of Sabah as enshrined in the 20 Points, Malaysia Agreement and the Federal Constitution.
"I would like to take the cue from Speaker Datuk Seri Salleh Tun Said Keruak who feels that Sabah should be given partial autonomy. Datuk Speaker also said it would be a complete waste of time when entering a negotiation with the knowledge that one's demands will not be accepted by the other side.
"Datuk Speaker also wants politics be set aside and adopt a diplomatic approach to solve these issues meaning Putrajaya needs a clear message that Sabahans and Sarawakians wish to seek a compromise.
"I fully agree that politics should be kept aside when discussing the rights of Sabah in Malaysia. We share the views of the forum on Sabah rights in Malaysia and that of Datuk Speaker," he said.
However, Bosi said they would like the three guarantees on the "Batu Sumpah" the freedom of religion in Sabah, land under Sabah government control and respect and preservation of the tradition and custom of the natives of Sabah by the government to be included in the deliberation.
Hence, the setting up a Select Committee on the position of Sabah in Malaysia under the Chairmanship of the Speaker is timely and most appropriate.
"I would like to recommend that the opposition lawmakers will be well represented in this committee. As per Standing Order 93 (4) non-lawmakers can be admitted to the Select Committee to assist in the deliberation of Sabah's position in Malaysia.
"It is only when the Sabah Assembly discusses and deliberates on Sabah's position in Malaysia vis-Ã -vis the 20 Points, Malaysia Agreement, Federal and Sabah Constitution and the Batu Sumpah that will carry weight and the force when it is submitted and presented to Putrajaya," he said.
Monday, 9 March 2015
Monday, March 09, 2015
BBC
,
Doris Jones
,
Exposing the Truth
,
Fact
,
FMT
,
International
,
Nationalist
,
Sabah
,
Sabah Sarawak Union (SSU)
,
Sarawak
,
SSKM
,
UK
No comments
Doris Jones vows to free Sabah, Sarawak
"We are not being allowed to practice freedom of speech and freedom of association. If you do, you end up in prison. There can be torture until you can die.”
KOTA KINABALU: UK-based Borneo rights activist Doris Jones, 46, who heads the Sabah Sarawak Union UK, told BBC News Radio Northampton on Friday that she doesn’t understand why Malaysia doesn’t want to allow Sabah and Sarawak to go from the list of states in the Federation, so that they can stand on their own two feet. “It’s a big question.”
BBC claimed that Jones was leading the campaign in the UK for independence back home on behalf of “some people in Sabah and Sarawak”. The station did not elaborate.
“If they don’t let us go, then we have the right to go independent,” said Jones who manages the Sabah Sarawak Keluar Malaysia (SSKM) Page on Facebook. “We are countries which can be on our own like Singapore and Brunei. We are entitled to stand on our own two feet.”
She was being interviewed, on repression of human rights and free speech in Borneo, on the eve of a peaceful protest outside the Malaysian High Commission in London. She explained the difficulties of running a campaign at home from the other side of the world.
“We are not being allowed to practice freedom of speech and freedom of association. If you do, you end up in prison. There can be torture until you can die.”
The rights activist also stressed that Interpol is not after her as made out by the Malaysian Government in the local media but conceded that she may be arrested under the Sedition Act if she returns home. Her family has not been in contact with her since their mobile phones have allegedly been taken away.
“I am not stopping the campaign because of their intimidation. It’s their way of doing things. It’s not that I don’t love my family.”
SSKM have between 200 and 300 volunteers in Sabah. About 14 of them have since been hauled up but released and may face unspecified charges. “Five of them were arrested at a petrol station. They had nothing on them. The first group had only pen and paper with them for people to sign a Petition,” said Jones. “The goal of this campaign is for us to stand on our own feet.”
Jones, who has been abroad the last two decades and led a campaign for the past five years for independence, told the radio station that she was about ten years old when she realised that something was not right about Sabah and Sarawak being in a Federation with the peninsula. “We were not allowed to say anything,” she said. “Racism, discrimination. There’s no democracy.”
The Foreign Office, in a similar statement, said that they will stand up for the human rights of anyone and this includes the right to free speech and freedom of association. “Anyone in the UK who’s being harassed or threatened by anyone should report to the police. We support the right of anyone to express themselves in free speech without any threat or intimidation.”
“We, along with our EU partners, continue to urge the Malaysian Government to pursue laws and practices that foster tolerance and mutual respect.”
The Malaysian High Commission declined comment.
Monday, March 09, 2015
BBC
,
Doris Jones
,
Exposing the Truth
,
Fact
,
FMT
,
International
,
Nationalist
,
Sabah Sarawak Union (SSU)
,
SSKM
,
UK
No comments
M’sian govt intimidating me, says Doris Jones
However Interpol says Malaysia has not contacted them to track down the human rights campaigner.
LONDON: A human rights campaigner says she is being “intimidated” after newspaper claims the Malaysian government had approached Interpol to track her down.
Doris Jones has lived in Northampton for 20 years, but is campaigning for the independence of East Malaysia.
“We are not allowed to practice freedom of speech. If you do you end up in prison,” she told BBC News on Saturday.
Interpol however said it has not been contacted by the Malaysian government over Jones.
Jones, 46, runs a social media movement called “Sabah Sarawak Keluar Malaysia (SSKM)”, which promotes the secession of Sabah and Sarawak from Malaysia.
Malaysian media reports said police in the country were seeking help from Interpol to track down Jones on allegations of incitement under the Sedition Act.
The Act was introduced in 1948 to use against communist insurgents, but today bans any act, speech or publication that brings contempt against the government.
Most privately owned print titles in the country are run by business groups allied with the ruling coalition.
One of the articles appeared in The Star, which is majority-owned by MCA, part of the ruling Barisan Nasional alliance.
Jones said she would be “dragged by police to the court and imprisoned without charge” if she sets foot in Malaysia.
She said police had threatened her family in Malaysia and taken mobile phones from them.
“My parents, brothers and sisters can’t contact me at all,” she said.
A Foreign Office spokesman said the UK “defends the right of individuals to express their views without the threat of intimidation”.
“We urge the Malaysian government to pursue laws and practices that foster tolerance,” he said.
The Malaysian High Commission did not respond to BBC enquiries.
Sunday, 8 March 2015
Sunday, March 08, 2015
Borneo
,
Doris Jones
,
Exposing the Truth
,
Fact
,
International
,
Nationalist
,
News
,
Sabah
,
Sabah Sarawak Union (SSU)
,
Sarawak
,
UK
No comments
Temu-ramah Doris Jones bersama dengan BBC Radio Online UK
Temu-ramah BBC Radio Online bersama dengan Pejuang Kebangsaan Borneo, Doris Jones. Sila luangkan masa anda untuk mendengarkannya dan sebarkan...
Seperti yang pihak kami katakan, pihak antarabangsa memang sedar dan peka tentang perkara yang sedang berlaku di Borneo. Jadi, siapa yang malu telanjang sekarang???
Kepada wartawan, anda boleh menggunakan audio ini untuk liputan media anda.
Sebarkan....
Join The Fight!
Sunday, March 08, 2015
BBC
,
Doris Jones
,
International
,
Nationalist
,
News
,
Sabah
,
Sabah Sarawak Union (SSU)
,
Sarawak
,
SSKM
No comments
Human rights campaigner 'intimidated' by Malaysian government
A human rights campaigner says she is being "intimidated" after newspaper claims the Malaysian government had approached Interpol to track her down.
Doris Jones has lived in Northampton for 20 years, but is campaigning for independence for East Malaysia.
She said: "We are not allowed to practice freedom of speech. If you do you end up in prison."
Interpol said it has not been contacted by the Malaysian government about Ms Jones.
Ms Jones, 46, runs a social media movement called Sabah Sarawak Kelual Malaysia, which promotes the secession of Sabah and Sarawak from Malaysia. She says she has 200 supporters under her control in the region.
"We urge the Malaysian Government to pursue laws and practices that foster tolerance”
Foreign Office spokesman
The area, also known as Malaysian Borneo, is located on the island of Borneo.
Malaysian media reports said police in the country were seeking help from Interpol to track down Ms Jones on allegations of incitement under the Sedition Act.
The Act was introduced in 1948 to use against communist insurgents, but today bans any act, speech or publication that brings contempt against the government.
![]() |
| Interpol said it had not been contacted by the Malaysian government about Doris Jones |
Most privately-owned print titles in the country are run by business groups allied with the ruling coalition.
One of the articles appeared in The Star, which is majority-owned by the Malaysian Chinese Association, part of the ruling Barisan Nasional alliance.
Ms Jones said she would be "dragged by police to the court and imprisoned without charge" if she set foot in Malaysia.
She said police had threatened her family and taken mobile phones from them.
"My parents, brothers and sisters can't contact me at all," she said.
A Foreign Office spokesman said the UK "defends the right of individuals to express their views without the threat of intimidation".
"We urge the Malaysian government to pursue laws and practices that foster tolerance," he said.
The Malaysian High Commission did not respond to BBC enquiries.
Apa yang sebenarnya berlaku ketika rusuhan 1969?
Siri peristiwa yang berlaku sewaktu rusuhan '13 Mei' telah didokumen oleh Dr Kua Kia Soong dalam buku terbarunya bertajuk May 13: Declassified Documents on the Malaysian Riots of 1969 akan dilancarkan Ahad ini sempena ulangtahun ke-38 tragedi tersebut.
Kompilasi itu, yang berdasarkan kepada pelbagai laporan asing dan laporan sulit pada masa itu yang telah dideklafisikasikan baru-baru ini dan boleh didapati di Pejabat Rekod Awam di London yang dianggap sebagai catatan yang boleh dipercayai berhubung tragedy tersebut.
Dr Kua menulis dalam bukunya itu bahawa keadaan sebenar mengenai rusuhan kaum yang terburuk dalam sejarah negara itu sehingga ini tidak diketahui oleh rakyat Malaysia.
Malah, katanya, versi rasmi mengenai tragedi itu penuh dengan percanggahan dan maklumat yang tidak mencukupi yang boleh dipercayai.
Di bawah adalah petikan dan ringkasan kronologi peristiwa rusuhan 13 Mei yang dipetik daripada buku Dr Kua itu:
10 Mei:
Parti Perikatan yang memerintah mengalami kekalahan teruk dalam pilihanraya umum tetapi masih memperolehi majoriti mudah di Dewan Rakyat. Perikatan kalah di Pulau Pinang kepada Gerakan; Kelantan kepada PAS dan menang tipis di Perak dan Selangor.
11 dan 12 Mei:
Pada kedua-dua malam tersebut, pembangkang merayakan kemenangan mereka. Satu perarakan besar parti Gerakan diadakan untuk mengalu-alukan kepulangan pemimpin parti itu, V David yang menang kerusi Parlimen di Pulau Pinang.
13 Mei:
MCA yang kalah teruk dalam pilihanraya umum itu, mengumumkan ia akan menarik diri daripada menganggotai kabinet tetapi masih kekal dalam Perikatan.
Satu laporan wartawan asing menunjukkan ada bukti bahawa ada rancangan bagi pemuda yang digerakkan oleh elemen-elemen dalam Umno untuk mengadakan perhimpunan di kediaman Menteri Besar Selangor ketika itu, Datuk Harun Idris pada lewat petangnya. Satu perbarisan balas telah dirancang diadakan walaupun tidak mendapat kebenaran pihak polis.
Apabila orang ramai masih berhimpun di perbarisan tersebut, pergaduhan berlaku dekat Kampung Baru, di mana dua buah lori orang Cina telah dibakar. Tragedi di Kampung Baru itu merebak dengan cepat ke serata tempat di Kuala Lumpur.
Wartawan asing itu berpendapat perintah berkurung yang dikenakan tidak adil kepada semua orang.
"Di jalan-jalan dekat Jalan Hale, saya dapat melihat pemuda Melayu yang bersenjatakan parang dan buluh runcing berhimpun di kawasan yang dapat dilihat dengan jelas oleh pasukan keselamatan yang berkawal di persimpangan jalan. Manakala di Batu Road, sejumlah wartawan asing melihat anggota Regimen Askar Melayu menembak ke dalam rumah-rumah kedai orang Cina tanpa sebarang sebab.
Perdana Menteri, Tunku Abdul Rahman terus mengatakan bahawa keganasan itu berpunca daripada tindak tanduk penyokong pembangkang selepas keputusan pilihanraya diumumkan, manakala timbalannya, Tun Abdul Razak menyalahkan pihak komunis.
14 Mei:
Rusuhan berterusan tetapi secara kecilan. Perintah berkurung hanya ditarik balik di pelbagai kawasan secara berperingkat mengikut waktu-waktu tertentu bagi membolehkan penduduk keluar membeli makanan. Pihak polis telah mengerahkan semua anggotanya bertugas dan menyerahkan tugas mengawal bahagian utara bandaraya kepada pihak tentera.
Polis berkata 44 orang terbunuh dan 150 lagi cedera pada malam sebelumnya. Satu lagi laporan menunjukkan kebanyakan mangsanya adalah orang Cina dan ia menyatakan sekurang-kurangnya 66 daripada 77 mayat di hospital besar pada 14 Mei adalah orang Cina.
Percubaan kerajaan untuk menyalahkan komunis yang mencetuskan rusuhan tersebut bagaimanapun tidak diambil serius oleh para pegawai di Pesuruhjaya Tinggi British (BHC), yang berpendapat Tunku tidak bersedia menyalahkan orangnya sendiri yang mencetuskan rusuhan tersebut, dan tidak pula menyalahkannya kepada orang CIna "secara keseluruhannya".
15 Mei:
Yang di-Pertuan Agong mengisytiharkan darurat. Majlis Gerakan Negara yang diketuai oleh Tun Razak ditubuhkan. Tun Razak masih bertanggungjawab kepada Tunku, tetapi semua kuasa di bawah Peraturan Darurat diletakkan dalam tangannya.
Perintah berkurung itu ditarik balik buat sementara di Kuala Lumpur pagi itu tetapi keadaan kembali buruk dan berlaku banyak pergaduhan di sana sini. Perintah berkurung dikuatkuasakan semula tetapi bekalan makanan makin berkurangan.
Penerbitan akhbar-akhbar tempatan telah digantung sehingga peraturan penapisan digubal tetapi tiada usaha diambil untuk menyelia laporan-laporan yang dihantar keluar oleh wartawan asing.
16 Mei:
Keadaan masih tegang di Selangor di mana kereta dan rumah dibakar dan angka korban meningkat. Jumlah kematian meningkat kepada 89 orang dengan lebih 300 lagi mengalami kecederaan. Perintah berkurung 24 jam diteruskan di Selangor dan turut dikuatkuasakan di Melaka. Di Pulau Pinang dan Perak, keadaan semakin baik walaupun perintah berkurung masih dikuatkuasakan.
Tunku membuat pengumuman mengenai penubuhan Pasukan Pertahanan Negara yang akan dianggotai oleh sukarelawan. Menteri Penerangan yang baru, Datuk Hamzah Abu Samah dan Tun Razak mengadakan siding akhbar di mana mereka mengatakan punca rusuhan itu adalah peresapan komunis ke dalam parti-parti politik.
Terdapat laporan mengenai perbuatan mencuri oleh anggota tentera Melayu dan sikap mereka yang berat sebelah terhadap masyarakat Cina Malaysia. Jumlah pelarian juga meningkat.
17 Mei:
Sepucuk telegram BHC, ia menunjukkan terdapat keraguan di kalangan para pegawai British tentang angka rasmi mangsa rusuhan dan jumlah kematian yang tinggi di kalangan orang Cina. Polis menganggarkan kira-kira 100 kematian manakala para pegawai British pula menganggarkan nisbah kematian orang Cina berbanding dengan Melayu ialah kira-kira 85:15.
Tindakan menapis laporan akhbar telah mencetuskan kritikan bukan sahaja dari kalangan media tempatan tetapi juga di kalangan anggota diplomatik terutama apabila kenyataan rasmi tidak jelas dan tidak berwibawa.
Memorandum sulit BHC kepada Pejabat Asing dan Komanwel (FCO), mengakui mengenai coup d'etat atau rampasan kuasa dan kuasa telah berpindah bukan sahaja 'ke tangan orang Melayu' tetapi juga pasukan keselamatan. Ekoran itu profesionalisme pasukan keselamatan dipersoalkan.
BHC juga mencatatkan bahawa di kalangan pasukan keselamatan, Unit Simpanan Persekutuan yang pada masa ini mempunyai anggota pelbagai kaum lebih adil dan tidak bersikap berat sebelah. Manakala anggota Melayu pula bersikap diskriminasi ketika menguatkuasakan perintah berkurung.
"Diskriminasi itu berlaku, sebagai contohnya, tidak menguatkuasakan perintah berkurung di kawasan Melayu (Kampung Baru) di mana orang Melayu yang bersenjatakan parang, dsb, terus bergerak bebas, dan ada yang menyelinap keluar dan menyerang orang Cina di luar kawasan tersebut. Di kawasan orang Cina, perintah berkurung dikuatkuasakan secara ketat.
18 Mei:
Tunku memperjelaskan kenyataan awalnya bahawa kekacauan itu dicetuskan oleh komunis, dengan meletakkan kesalahan itu kepada "anasir-anasir jahat". Beliau juga mengumumkan penangguhan pilihanraya Sarawak dan sekatan terhadap pergerakan wartawan asing diteruskan.
Keadaan masih belum pulih di beberapa kawasan di ibu Negara.
19 Mei:
Tidak sampai seminggu selepas berlaku rusuhan tersebut, kuasa pemerintahan telah diserahkan kepada Tun Razak - menunjukkan adanya komplot melakukan rampasan kuasa.
"Hubungan sebenar antara Tun Razak dengan Tunku adalah tidak jelas. Di khalayak awam, Tun Razak berkata beliau bertanggungjawab terus kepada Tunku tetapi di belakangnnya, beliau menyatakan sebaliknya. Ini mungkin bermakna, telah bermula proses pelepasan jawatan Tunku sebagai Perdana Menteri".
Dilaporkan terdapat kira-kira 10,000 pelarian. Media tempatan dibenar diterbitkan dengan tapisan manakala pas perintah berkurung untuk wartawan asing ditarik balik. Beberapa ahli politik pembangkang telah ditahan.
20 Mei:
Dalam satu mesyuarat, Pesuruhjaya Tinggi Australia telah mencadangkan supaya pemimpin pembangkang diberi peranan sebagai pengaman, tetapi ditolak oleh Tun Razak dan Tan Sri Ghazali Shafie. "Mereka menganggap pemimpin pembangkang akan menggunakan peluang itu untuk kepentingan politik mereka sendiri."
Persatuan Bulan Sabit Merah Malaysia meneruskan program memberi makanan harian kepada para pelarian di pelbagai tempat dan lebih 5,000 menerima bekalan makanan.
21 Mei:
Statistik rasmi mangsa korban ketika itu adalah seramai 137 orang (18 Melayu), 342 cedera, 109 kenderaan dibakar, 118 makanan musnah dan 2,912 orang ditahan, sebahagian besarnya kerana melanggar perintah berkurung.
23 Mei:
Dokumen yang dideklasifikasikan itu mendedahkan anggota tentera Melayu bukan sahaja baik dengan samseng Melayu tetapi juga melepaskan tembakan sembarangan ke arah rumah kedai orang Cina ketika mereka meronda di kawasan bandaraya.
"Ketika ditanya oleh wartawan asing mengenai laporan berlakunya diskriminasi kaum itu, Tun Razak menafikan semuanya. Ekoran itu, pas perintah berkurung yang dikeluarkan kepada wartawan asing ditarik balik dan mereka diarahkan tidak keluar arumah "demi keselamatan diri mereka".
Laporan seorang wartawan asing menunjukkan samseng-samseng Melayu sangat dibenci oleh penduduk Melayu yang mematuhi undang-undang di Kampung Baru.
Menteri Keselamatan Dalam Negeri, Tun Dr Ismail membayangkan bahawa Akta Keselamatan Dalam Negeri akan dipinda pada masa depan "untuk bertindak balas terhadap taktik komunis". Diumumkan 3,699 telah ditahan sepanjang krisis tersebut dan 952 adalah anggota kongsi gelap.
24 Mei:
Keamanan dipulihkan di Kuala Lumpur dan suasana di bandaraya juga semakin baik. Orang ramai kembali bekerja (di luar waktu perintah berkurung). Perintah berkurung itu masih dikuatkuasakan (dari jam 3 petang hingga 6.30 pagi hari berikutnya). Kerajaan tidak bersedia untuk mengakui bahawa pemuda Melayu yang bersenjatalah yang mencetuskan kekacauan tersebut.
27 Mei:
Tunku amat marah dengan spekulasi wartawan asing mengenai kedudukannya yang dikatakan semakin lemah dan seterusnya mengarahkan setiausaha sulitnya supaya menghantar nota bantahan kepada BHC.
28 Mei:
Satu laporan sulit BHC kepada FCO pada hari ini menyifatkan percubaan kerajaan untuk menyalahkan komunis sebagai pencetus rusuhan tersebut sebagai satu usaha untuk menjustifikasikan kuasa authoritarian yang baru.
Jun:
Keadaan kembali terkawal tetapi masih berlaku kekacauan di sana sini. Laporan BHC menegaskan keganasan berlaku lagi di satu kawasan di Kuala Lumpur pada malam 28 dan 29 Jun, di mana beberapa buah rumah telah dibakar dan lima orang terbunuh dan 25 lagi cedera. Beberapa kekacauan yang berlaku pada penghujung bulan Jun juga membabitkan kaum India.
Julai:
Berlaku satu lagi kekacauan di mana seorang anggota polis terbunuh tetapi pihak polis bertindak segera mengawalnya supaya tidak merabak ke tempat lain di Kuala Lumpur.
Pendirian tegas Tun Ismail dalam mengarahkan pasukan keselamatan bertindak tegas "tanpa memilih bulu' terhadap mana-mana kumpulan dan pengumuman Tunku mengenai penubuhan Jawatankuasa Muhibbah Negara yang dianggotai ahli politik dari semua parti politik, telah membantu mengurangkan rasa takut di kalangan rakyat.
Tun Ismail juga mengumumkan bahawa 8,114 telah ditahan sehingga Mei, terdiri daripada mereka "dari semua kaum-kaum utama". Daripada jumlah itu, 4,192 telah didakwa di mahkamah, 675 dibebaskan dengan ikatjamin, 1,552 dibebaskan tanpa syarat dan ,695 dikena tahanan pencegahan.
Keadaan di Semenanjung kembali baik semula tetapi tahap ketegangan masih tinggi di kawasan sensitif di Melaka, Perak and Selangor.
Ketegangan semakin pulih tetapi menjadi panas semula ekoran pemecatan Dr Mahathir Mohamad daripada Jawatankuasa Pusat Umno pada 12 Julai dan Tunku memperolehi semula kuasa. Mahasiswa Melayu menghantar petisyen menuntut Tunku meletakkan jawatan dan mengadakan demonstrasi di kampus.
Sebarkan...
Mendedahkan punca sebenar rusuhan 13 Mei 1969 di malaya
Beh Lih Yi
5:04PM Mei 11 2007
"Ketika orang ramai masih berhimpun untuk perbarisan tersebut, pergaduhan berlaku di Kampung Baru berhampiran, di mana dua lori orang Cina telah dibakar.
"Pada jam 7.15 petang, saya dapat lihat satu gerombolan berkumpul seperti lebah di persimpangan Jalan Raja Muda dan Batu Road. Lebih banyak kenderaan dipecahkan dan rumah kedai orang Cina dibakar.
"Pekedai Cina dan India di Batu Road telah bergabung membentuk satu 'pasukan pertahanan kawasan' dengan bersenjatakan apa sahaja yang sempat dicapai parang, kayu, batang besi dan botol.
"Apabila kumpulan orang Melayu beredar, maka penduduk terbabit terus tertindak balas. Bahagian depan kedai dan kereta yang disyaki milik orang Melayu telah dipecahkan atau dibakar.
"Polis tiba kira-kira jam 9 malam tetapi tidak berkawal di situ. Kemudian, trak yang membawa anggota Unit Simpanan Persekutuan (pasukan pencegah rusuhan) dan Regimen Askar Melayu beredar dari situ."
(Petikan daripada catatan wartawan Far Eastern Economic Review, Bob Reece, mengenai apa yang disaksikan dengan matanya sendiri berlaku pada 13 Mei 1969 selepas sekumpulan pemuda Melayu berkumpul di luar rumah Menteri Besar Selangor, Datuk Harun Idris lewat petang hari berkenaan).
Sudah hampir empat dekad berlalu selepas tercetusnya rusuhan kaum pada 13 Mei 1969
Bagaimanapun, apakah yang mencetuskan rusuhan paling buruk dalam sejarah 50 tahun Malaysia, yang mengorbankan 196 nyawa (mengikut rekod rasmi), masih menjadi rahsia, dan sehingga ini terdapat pelbagai versi mengenainya.
'Versi rasmi' menyebut rusuhan tersebut berpunca daripada tindakan provokasi penyokong pembangkang yang didominasi kaum Cina, yang merayakan kejayaan mereka dalam pilihanraya umum yang menyaksikan Parti Perikatan kalah teruk.
'Semuanya karut'
Bagaimanapun, pihak pembangkang telah menyangkal kebenaran versi tersebut. Terdapat teori-teori lain yang mendakwa rusuhan itu telah dirancang untuk menggulingkan Perdana Menteri, Tunku Abdul Rahman.
Kekurangan maklumat awam mengenainya menjadi batu penghalang bagi mereka yang ingin mendedahkan apa yang sebenarnya berlaku. Tetapi satu set dokumen yang baru dideklasifikasikan di London, telah membuka peluang kepada ahli sosiologi, Dr Kua Kia Soong untuk mencari kebenarannya.
Pada akhir tahun lalu, Pengetua Kolej New Era itu telah mengambil cuti belajar selama tiga bulan untuk meneliti rekod dan dokumen di Pejabat Rekod Awam di London mengenai tragedi 13 Mei yang telah dideklasifikasikan selepas luputnya tempoh 30 tahun dokumen berkenaan dideklasifikasi sebagai rahsia.
Hasil kajiannya ke atas dokumen yang dideklafisikasikan itu yang telah dikompilasikan dalam buku terbaru Dr Kua yang akan dilancarkan Ahad ini mendapati rusuhan 13 Mei itu bukanlah berpunca daripada keganasan kaum, sepertimana yang telah digambar kepada rakyat Malaysia.
"Sejarah (rasmi peristiwa) 13 Mei penuh dengan karut-marut, ia tidak mendedahkan apa-apa. Ia meletakkan kesalahan itu ke atas parti pembangkang yang sebenarnya tidak benar, mereka bukan menjadi puncanya," kata Dr Kua kepada malaysiakini dalam satu temubual baru-baru ini.
"Buku saya itu menunjukkan bahawa pihak yang bertanggungjawab adalah golongan kapitalis (dalam Umno), elemen-elemen dalaman yang merancang dan melaksanakan pelan ini. Ada rancangannya berdasarkan kepada mereka yang berkumpul di kediaman menteri besar (Selangor).
"Terdapat dokumen dan laporan risikan yang menunjukkan perkara itu. Sejarah rasmi perlu mendedahkan kebenaran dan bukannya meletakkan kesalahan kepada setiap orang yang sepatutnya tidak harus dipersalahkan," kata aktivis sosial dan pendidikan itu.
Dr Kua menegaskan bahawa peristiwa 13 Mei merupakan satu 'coup d'etat' atau rampasan kuasa terhadap Tunku oleh golongan kapitalis Melayu yang muncul ketika itu yang disokong oleh polis dan tentera untuk merampas kuasa daripada aristokrat lama untuk melaksanakan agenda baru Melayu.
Plot menumbangkan Tunku
Beliau berpendapat, rusuhan itu adalah perbuatan 'samseng Melayu' yang disokong oleh ahli-ahli politik di belakang rancangan rampasan kuasa tersebut.
Sebagai contohnya, kata beliau, "sekumpulan samseng tiba-tiba muncul dari semua penjuru" pada 13 Mei untuk berkumpul di kediaman Datuk Harun dan tindak-tanduk polis dan tentera yang boleh dipersoalkan yang hanya berdiri dan memerhatikan sahaja apa yang sedang berlaku.
Tambahnya, dokumen-dokumen itu juga menunjukkan, kurang daripada seminggu selepas rusuhan tersebut, Timbalan Perdana Menteri ketika itu, Tun Abdul Razak, yang mempengerusikan Majlis Operasi Negara, diberikuasa penuh untuk mentadbir negara satu petanda wujudnya komplot mengenainya.
Manakala perbincangan mengenai perancangan masa depan telahpun dijalankan sebelumnya, termasuk Dasar Kebudayaan Negara (diumumkan pada 1971).
Satu dokumen rahsia dari pejabat kabinet Britain yang dimuat dalam buku tersebut, menunjukkan, tidak sampai seminggu selepas rusuhan itu berlaku, Agensi Perisikan Pusat (CIA) dapat mengesan apa yang sedang dirancang oleh Tun Razak 'untuk memperkukuhkan ketuanan Melayu, meminggirkan kaum Cina dan mengenepikan Tunku'.
Dr Kua turut mempersoalkan peranan anggota pasukan keselamatan dalam peristiwa berdarah 13 Mei itu.
"Malah, ketika itu, kalangan diplomatik (juga bertanya-tanya) mengapakah, pada hari rusuhan itu berlaku, Razak bertemu dengan pegawai tertinggi polis dan tentera, tetapi mereka tidak berbuat apa-apa," katanya.
Lebih menarik lagi, kata Dr Kua, pasukan keselamatan Malaysia adalah sebuah pasukan yang berpengalaman luas sewaktu melancarkan peperangan terhadap pengganas komunis antara tahun 1948 dan 1960 dan bereputasi tinggi.
"Merekalah yang berjaya menghapuskan penentangan komunis yang membabitkan operasi yang lebih sukar daripada mengawal rusuhan, tetapi mereka tidak dapat mengawal (rusuhan) pada 1969 selama berhari-hari, berminggu-minggu," soalnya.
Ekoran itu, Dr Kua membuat kesimpulan: "Peristiwa 13 Mei adalah satu helah untuk merampas kuasa. Saya bukanlah orang pertama yang berkata bahawa ia adalah satu rampasan kuasa, tetapi saya menyediakan dokumen yang menunjukkan bahawa ia adalah satu rampasan kuasa."
Jumlah korban tidak diketahui
Dokumen yang telah dideklafisikasikan itu termasuk laporan-laporan yang dibuat oleh wartawan asing yang berada di Kuala Lumpur pada masa itu, laporan kakitangan Pesuruhjaya Tinggi British yang memantau insiden tersebut dan pelbagai lagi laporan sulit dari kalangan diplomat.
Ini dianggap pertamakalinya satu catatan lengkap mengenai tragedi tersebut akan dapat ditatapi rakyat Malaysia, kerana banyak laporan wartawan asing telah diharamkan di samping tiada akses terhadap dokumen tempatan.
Bagaimanapun, apa yang tidak dapat dipastikan dalam buku tersebut adalah satu lagi rahsia, iaitu jumlah sebenar korban tragedi tersebut.
Angka rasmi korban rusuhan 13 Mei adalah 196 orang, 180 cedera akibat senjatapi dan 259 lagi cedera kerana senjata lain, 9,143 orang ditangkap dan 5,561 daripadanya didakwa di mahkamah, 6,000 kehilangan tempat tinggal, dan sekurang-kurangnya 211 kenderaan dan 753 bangunan telah musnah atau mengalami kerosakan.
Dokumen yang telah dideklasifikasikan dan dokumen antarabangsa yang lain pada masa itu menganggarkan jumlah korban yang lebih tinggi tetapi angka sebenarnya tidak diketahui, tetapi majoriti korban tersebut dikatakan dari kalangan orang Cina.
Dr Kua berkata, beliau berharap dapat memecahkan mitos tersebut melalui penerbitan bukunya.
"Iaitu rusuhan kaum akan berlaku bila orang Melayu tidak merasa senang, itulah sebabkan mengapa kita perlukan Dasar Ekonomi Baru, polisi tindakan afirmatif dan yang lain-lainnya, jika tidak orang Melayu tidak merasa senang dan rusuhan akan tercetus.
"Ini adalah mitos pertama yang kita perlu uraikan kerana dokumen-dokumen menunjukkan sesetengah mereka yang mencetuskannya (tragedi 13 Mei) bersubahat dengan pihak polis dan tentera," katanya.
Mitos kedua, kata Dr Kua, ahli akademik dan ahli teori majmuk yang memegang pandangan bahawa rusuhan akan berlaku secara semulajadi dalam negara yang rakyatnya terdiri dari berbilang kaum.
Sebaliknya, kata beliau, orang Melayu, Cina dan India tidak secara tiba-tiba mengambil keputusan untuk bergaduh sesame mereka.
"Ia tidak berlaku macam itu," tambahnya.
Ditanya sama ada beliau bimbang pihak berkuasa akan bertindak mengharamkan bukunya itu sepertimana yang berlaku kepada buku mengenai pergaduhan di Kampung Medan, Dr Kua berkata: "Dalam zaman internet, apa maknanya apabila sesebuah buku itu diharamkan? Kita boleh siarkannya di lamanweb, anda boleh buat apa saja". Berita asal
***Sambung pembacaan anda melalui artikel ini: Apa yang sebenarnya berlaku dalam rusuhan 1969?***
Perjanjian Persekutuan Tanah Melayu (Malaya) 1957
Parti gabungan kaum, iaitu Parti Perikatan telah memenangi pilihan raya pada tahun 1955. Setelah membentuk kerajaan, Tunku Abdul Rahman telah mengetuai satu rombongan ke London untuk merundingkan kemerdekaan. Seterusnya satu suruhanjaya bebas telah dibentuk bagi menggubal perlembagaan merdeka.
Pada 31 Ogos 1957, kemerdekaan telah diisytiharkan oleh Tunku Abdul Rahman yang menamatkan penjajahan asing terhadap Persekutuan Tanah Melayu iaitu yang berlaku selama 446 tahun. Kemerdekaan ini adalah hasil perjuangan generasi lalu yang tidak mengenal erti penat dan lelah. Oleh itu, kemerdekaan ini mesti kita pertahankan dengan penuh rasa tanggungjawab supaya kemerdekaan yang telah dicapai tidak musnah begitu sahaja.
Pada awal tahun 1956 lagi, Parti Perikatan telah berusaha untuk mendapatkan kemerdekaan. Melalui kemerdekaan sahaja rakyat negara ini bebas memerintah mengikut cara dan hala tuju yang ditentukan oleh mereka.
Sebagai ketua Menteri Persekutuan Tanah Melayu, Tunku Abdul Rahman Putra telah berunding dengan Raja-raja Melayu dan British untuk mendapatkan kemerdekaan. Melalui perundingan tersebut, mereka akhirnya bersetuju untuk mengadakan mesyuarat rasmi dengan kerajaan British.
Seterusnya satu rombongan yang dinamakan Rombongan Merdeka telah dibentuk. Rombongan ini diwakili oleh empat orang wakil raja-raja Melayu dan empat orang wakil parti Perikatan. Ketua rombongan Merdeka ke London ialah Tunku Abdul Rahman Putra.
Orang ramai telah memberi sokongan padu dan menaruh harapan yang tinggi kepada Tunku Abdul Rahman dan rombongannya.
Lord Lennox-Boyd, iaitu Setiausaha Tanah Jajahan British telah dilantik mempengerusikan Rundingan London. Rundingan ini telah berlangsung dari 18 Januari hingga 8 februari 1956. Kedua-dua pihak telah bersetuju menandatangani satu perjanjian yang dinamakan Perjanjian London.
Beberapa perkara penting telah dipersetujui dalam rundingan tersebut iaitu:
- Pelantikan sebuah suruhanjaya bebas untuk menggubal perlembagaan merdeka.
- Parti Perikatan tidak akan mengambil alih perniagaan British atau kepentingan Barat di Tanah Melayu.
- Satu perjanjian dengan British akan ditandatangani bagi menjaga keselamatan Tanah Melayu dan juga menjaga kepentingan ekonomi British di Tanah Melayu.
- Tarikh kemerdekaan Persekutuan Tanah Melayu ditetapkan pada 31 Ogos 1957.
- Institusi raja berpelembagaan dikekalkan.
- Pembahagian kuasa antara kerajaan pusat dengan kerajaan negeri diteruskan
Pada 20 Februari 1956, Rombongan Merdeka telah kembali ke Tanah Melayu. Kepulangan mereka telah disambut dengan meriah dalam perhimpunan besar-besaran diadakan Padang Merdeka, Banda Hilir di Melaka. Tunku Abdul Rahman Putra kemudian telah mengisytiharkan tarikh kemerdekaan Persekutuan Tanah Melayu.
Source: https://cikguhashim.wordpress.com/2012/05/08/nota-bab-5-kemerdekaan-persekutuan-tanah-melayu-1957/
Saturday, 7 March 2015
Saturday, March 07, 2015
Brunei
,
Exposing the Truth
,
Fact
,
Federation of Malaysia 16 September 1963
,
History
,
Nationalist
,
North Borneo
,
Sabah
,
Sarawak
No comments
PEMBERONTAKKAN WESTON DISEMBER 7 SEPTEMBER 1962
KENYATAAN VETERAN TNKU SARJEN MAJOR OTHMAN BIN HJ ISMAIL
![]() |
| Sarjen Major Othman Bin Hj Ismail |
Sinopsis Perang Weston 1962
Pada awal tahun 1962 wakil Parti Rakyat Brunei telah datang ke Kg.Lubuk menyeru rakyat Weston yang rata-ratanya berketurunan etnik Brunei agar menyertai perjuangan Parti Rakyat Brunei menentang pemerintahan koloni British, bagi menuntut kemerdekaan dan menubuhkan Persekutuan Borneo iaitu Brunei, Sabah dan Sarawak. Walaupun mendapat sokongan rakyat dan mendapat kerusi penuh dalam parlimen Brunei, usaha menuntut hak kemerdekaan rakyat Borneo ini dihalang oleh kuasa koloni British, jesteru sebuah angkatan Tentera Nasional Kalimantan Utara (BorneoUtara) telah ditubuhkan diseluruh Borneo Utara bagi persediaan menuntut kemerdekaan. Atas dasar perjuangan ini dan semangat patriotik terhadap Sabah, hampir kesemua warga Weston bangkit menyertai perjuangan ini.
Pembentukan TNKU Weston
Setelah wakil Parti Rakyat Brunei datang ke Kg.Lubuk seramai lima orang yang diketuai oleh Leftenan Hj Mukti dari Kg Lubuk,Sarjen Major Othman Bin Hj Ismail dan rakan telah dihantar ke Kuala Belait, Brunei untuk menjalani latihan ketenteraan selama dua minggu. Senjata, uniform dan bom buatan sendiri telah diberikan sebelum kembali ke Weston untuk merekrut anggota dan menuntut ilmu persilatan dan ilmu kebal dari seorang berbangsa Timur Indonesia bernama Omar.
Pada 7 Disember 1962 Sarjan Major Othman Bin Hj Ismail bergerak dari Kg Lubuk setelah menerima arahan dari pusat mengetuai sebuah pasukan TNKU untuk menawan dan menyerang balai polis Weston pada masa itu hanya dikawal oleh seorang anggota polis Awang Tengah. Beliau ditawan dan diikat, senjatanya greener shotgun telah dirampas oleh Sarjen Major Othman, kesemua senjata senapang patang dan rifel telah dirampas oleh pihak Insurgen TNKU.
Pertempuran Lingkungan
8 Disember 1962 Sarjan Major Othman Bin Hj Ismail mengambil kedudukan strategik sekitar Kg Lingkungan antara yang turut serta ialah Rahman Bin Hj Ismail ,Idris Bin Matasan,Lamit Bin Ajak, Jepun Bin Besar dan Tassim Bin Jaffar. Serangan bermula pada sekitar 9:00 pagi apabila peninjau TNKU telah menyedari kehadiran sebuah kenderaan Land Rover Polis membawa Pasukan North Borneo Mobile Police seramai 6-8 orang menuju ke lokasi mereka dan berhenti tidak jauh dari kedudukan serangan hendap, tanpa disedari Pasukan Polis Sarjen Major Othman menggunakan .22 rifel telah memulakan serangan dengan menembak kearah kenderaan land rover, pihak polis terpaksa membalas tembakan kearah insurgen. Semasa pertempuran Abdul Rahman telah menyalakan fius dan melontar bom buatan sendiri kearah kenderaan polis, walaubagaimana bom tersebut berjaya dibaling semula dan meletup kearah selamat, hasil dari keberanian seorang anggota polis dengan beraninya mengutip bom tersebut semasa tembakan bertubi-tubi dilepaskan oleh anggota insurgen TNKU kearah pasukannya. Pertempuran berlanjutan selama 30 minit ini berakhir dengan kedua pihak berundur tanpa sebarang kecederaan.
Sarjen Major Othman selepas pertempuran Lingkungan dengan seorang dirinya bergerak ke Limbang untuk memohon bantuan dari Pusat Tentera TNKU, setibanya di Limbang beliau diarah untuk bergerak ke balai polis Limbang yang ditawan dan telah diberikan senjata dan bantuan seramai 20 anggota TNKU etnik Iban Sarawak kembali ke Weston. Beliau kembali ke Weston dan mendapati ianya telah ditawan semula oleh pihak polis dan kebanyakkan insurgen TNKU telah ditawan, beliau mengarahkan 20 anggota TNKU Iban untuk kembali semula diiringi oleh Pak Cik beliau bernama Ghani Bin Hj Ismail.
Perang Gerilla
Sarjen Major Othman setibanya di Weston telah bertemu semula dengan beberapa orang bawahnya dan mengarahkan anggotanya untuk bersembunyi di sekitar hutan Kg.Lubuk untuk persediaan melancarkan serangan gerilla ke atas kedudukan Pasukan Polis di Weston. Hanya selepas Ibu bapa serta jaminan daripada pegawai British sekiranya beliau menyerah akan diberikan pengampunan barulah beliau dan anggota lain menyerah.
Didakwa
Sarjen Major Othman Bin Hj Ismail setelah menyerah diri ,beliau didakwa dan didapati bersalah atas kesalahan merompak, memiliki senjata tanpa permit dan mencetus huru-hara oleh Mahkamah Tinggi Kerajaan dan telah dijatuhkan hukuman penjara selama lima tahun dan tiga tahun keatas insurgen yang lain. Beliau merasa tertipu dengan janji pegawai British yang menjanjikan pengampunan, selepas setahun beliau melarikan diri dari penjara Kepayan menuju ke Soloo (Mindanau) dimana beliau tinggal selama dua tahun, keadaan hidup yang lebih sengsara berbanding di Sabah telah membuatkan beliau mengambil keputusan kembali dan menyerah diri di Labuan. Hukuman 5 tahun kembali dikenakan keatas beliau dan beliau menghabiskan tempoh penjara selama lima tahun.
Pra Konfontasi Indonesia-Brunei-British-Malaysia(Malaya/Sabah, Sarawak)sebenarnya bermula dari Sabah seawal dari 7 Disember 1962 serangan keatas Balai Polis Weston, pemberontakan Limbang berlaku pada 8 Disember 1962.
Kenyataan direkod oleh penyelidik bebas:-
Azlan Mohd Jaffar (Sabah Historical Research and Preservation Group)
Milin Biok Jr.
Monday, 23 February 2015
Monday, February 23, 2015
Doris Jones
,
Exposing the Truth
,
Fact
,
Nationalist
,
Sabah
,
Sabah Sarawak Union (SSU)
,
Sarawak
,
SSKM
No comments
Sabah activist dares authorities to extradite her
Alleged secessionist has no intention of returning to Malaysia to face possible sedition charges.
PETALING JAYA: Doris Jones, wanted by local authorities for promoting secession of Sabah and Sarawak from Malaysia, issued a dare to the authorities to utilise the proper channels to get her extradited back to Malaysia to face sedition charges.
She made it clear that she has no intentions of returning on her own accord.
Jones, accused of invoking secessionist sentiments via social media, through the Sabah Sarawak Keluar Malaysia (SSKM) page on Facebook reportedly told The Star that she was not aware of any summons from the authorities which lead to an arrest warrant issued by the Kota Kinabalu magistrate’s court.
While refusing to disclose her exact location at the time, Jones said, “They can try to get me in the United Kingdom, the European Union (EU) or maybe even Australia. They can try.
“I don’t think Malaysia has any extradition treaties with the EU,” said Jones.
Jones also spared details about herself and refused to acknowledge if she was still a Malaysian citizen.
“I don’t want to answer that. I am from Sabah,” she said.
The wanted activist is believed to be based in London and according to her, also contested in the May 2014 European Parliament election, on a UK-based National Liberal Party ticket.
Earlier this month, 14 activists linked to the secession movement were arrested in Tuaran and Kota Kinabalu, but have all been released on bail.
The stabbed governor of Sarawak
![]() |
| Duncan Stewart was killed several weeks into his governorship |
Previously secret documents show British officials covered up evidence about the assassination of a colonial governor in East Asia after World War II, fearing the truth might spark a war. But this, it seems, left an unjust stain on the reputation of a British man from a family of so-called White Rajahs.
In December 1949 the new governor of the recently acquired British colony of Sarawak was on his first official tour. Among Scotsman Duncan Stewart's previous postings was Palestine - one of the most dangerous in the world at that time. After that, it was thought he would have little to fear in the comparatively sleepy backwater of Sarawak, on the island of Borneo.
After a couple of weeks in the job, he went to the town of Sibu on his first official visit. He was welcomed warmly by a large crowd, who all seemed to be enjoying themselves, according to press reports of the day.
After inspecting a guard of honour, he walked on flanked by a gaggle of excited school children. Then a youth walked towards Governor Stewart holding a camera and asked to take his photo. As his Majesty's representative prepared to pose, another youth stabbed him.
Officials quickly grabbed the two youths and arrested them.
Despite suffering a deep stab wound, Governor Stewart is reported to have carried on for a while, as if the murderous assault hadn't happened. But when blood began to seep through his starched white uniform he was rushed away for treatment. He died a few days later, after being flown to a hospital in Singapore.
Two local Malay youths, Rosli bin Dobi and Moshidi bin Sedek, were tried for murder and later hanged. Both were thought to be members of a group dedicated to restoring Anthony Brooke, heir-elect of a British family of so-called White Rajahs, to the throne of Sarawak. The "anti-cession" movement objected to the decision to cede Sarawak to the British.
![]() |
| Anthony Brooke died in 2011, never officially told the assassination had nothing to do with him |
The Brookes had ruled this northern slice of the island of Borneo since the mid-19th Century. It had been given to Anthony's Great Great Uncle James by the then Sultan of Brunei, after the Victorian adventurer had quelled a revolt for him.
It was then run as a virtually independent and apparently benevolent kingdom by the Brooke family. The interests of the varied local tribal groups were, it seems, well protected by the Brookes as commercial pressures grew following an influx of investors and businessmen.
But, finally, in July 1946, Sarawak became Britain's last colonial acquisition. It was handed over to the British crown by Anthony Brooke's uncle, Charles Vyner Brooke, in exchange for a £200,000 pay-off.
![]() |
| Charles Vyner Brooke in Sarawak in 1946 |
But Anthony Brooke, who had been expected to take over as White Rajah of Sarawak, was not happy about this.
Neither were many locals. Even though his family were as British as the new colonial masters, they had become part of the local fabric, unlike the pith-helmeted rulers from far away.
Demonstrations, arranged by each Kampong (village community) greeted the first governor, Sir Charles Arden Clarke, on his arrival in Sarawak in 1946
![]() |
| Protests spread from village to village |
Numerous anti-cession protests were held. Placards called for a return to White Rajah rule led by Anthony Brooke.
So when the British governor was killed, suspicions naturally fell on him as the leader and focus of the anti-cession movement. Was he involved in the assassination plot as part of his bid to win back power? British officials left that looking a distinct possibility - but they knew more than they let on.
"That's not what the British government believes at all," says historian Simon Ball, of Glasgow University, who has extensively researched the case.
Indeed, evidence shows the ringleaders of the assassination plot were not acting for Anthony Brooke, nor did they have any intention of returning him to power. Instead, in a letter discovered by Professor Ball, written by one co-conspirator to the other, they make clear their intentions of helping neighbouring Indonesia to take over British Sarawak.
"What they want is freedom as part of Indonesia. So this is the underlying political motive for the killing. It's not to support [Anthony] Brooke."
_______________________________________________________
BBC Radio 4's Document is on at 20:00 GMT on Monday 12 March
Or listen again after broadcast on iPlayer
Radio 4: Document
_______________________________________________________
The British it seems, feared that to confront Indonesia with its involvement in such a plot might spark an unwelcome conflict. The newly independent nation had just driven out Dutch colonial troops by force, and the UK already had its hands full dealing with insurrection in British-run Malaya to the north-west.
So they decided to keep quiet about the fact that this had little to do with Brooke's supporters and a lot to do with an anti-colonial independence movement. In a letter marked "confidential", John Higham of the Colonial Office wrote to a colleague in the Foreign Office. "We have now come to the very definite conclusion that the publication of the correspondence would be dangerous and that it would be undesirable to show it to Anthony Brooke."
The Superintendent of the local Special Branch wrote two weeks later: "There is no evidence or suspicion that AB [Anthony Brooke] knew of the intention to assassinate H.E. [His Excellency] The Governor."
But despite all this, the finger of blame for the death of Governor Duncan Stewart was left pointing at Anthony Brooke, who was never officially told that his anti-cession campaign had little to do with the assassination.
A year later he formally gave up his claim to the Sarawak throne and travelled the world as a self-appointed peace ambassador, before settling in rural New Zealand where he died, aged 98, last year. His grandson, Jason Brooke, says it is distressing that his grandfather went to his grave not knowing the truth.
"I think it was very, very difficult for Anthony, the way he was landed with these… more than implications, almost accusations, of having at least a moral responsibility for what had happened to Duncan Stewart. It's sad, but that's history."
Document will be broadcast on Monday 12 March at 20:00 GMT on BBC Radio 4.
Oil prices are really low nowadays. Why? Let us find it out
Reasons for the crisis
We have decided to get back to basics of this crisis to begin with. As some of us probably remember, oil prices have begun to fall since July-August 2014. During our searches we have found an article written by Forbes’ contributor Thomas Landstreet. The piece was published on August 20th, when the general trend had already been tangible and oil price had almost touched the psychological point at $90 per barrel. However, this point was known as resistance level for the fossil’s price, so there still was a little hope that price would go up. But Thomas is an experienced analyst. Moreover, he saw how strong oil prices and actions of governments are tied together. So, in his article with the descriptive title: “Here Comes Cheaper Oil: Why Prices Are Set To Fall” - he predicted that prices would be as low as $90 by Christmas eve unless some crisis in geopolitics happened. The crisis occurred. Actually it was already there when the article was issued, so shame on you Thomas. Anyway, the prices are falling and falling significantly. As of this writing the oil costs almost $74 per barrel, which is the lowest price since August 2010. In any case, let us emphasize the main reasons of falling according to Landstreet.Firstly, political reforms towards liberalization of Mexican economy enacted by the country’s president Enrique Pena Nieto in 2013. These reforms have lead to opening Mexican energy markets to foreign and private companies. The connection is obvious. It is much cheaper to extract oil in Mexico than to make fracking in the US for example.Secondly, Thomas was predicting that if the republicans won the midterm elections, the process of liberalization of oil industry in the USA would be accelerated. And, he was right. Republicans have won and now the oil-producing industry has an access to chip extraction of fossils at US Atlantic coast.Thirdly, gasoline in US costs too much, which is actually a reason to liberalize oil-industry in states to make fuel cheapen. This process in its turn has an effect on oil prices, because producing becomes cheaper too. Also, some analysts claim that OPEC members are not cutting production and knocking crude prices down in order to throw US shale projects out of the market. But it sounds like another conspiracy theory. Talking about the reasons that caused falling of crude prices, we cannot avoid mentioning the article written by Matthew Philips for Bloomberg’s Businessweek. He claims, and it is absolutely sound, that oil supply has risen but demand is significantly decreasing at the same time. Namely, stagnation of European economy and deceleration of growth in China. Also, unwillingness of OPEC countries to reduce oil production makes crude prices to fall. All of them, excluding Saudi Arabia, are producing as much as they were during last years. Moreover, Libya and Angola have even increased oil extraction.
Is it an actual crisis?
Not really. First of all, we have too much oil, meaning enough to satisfy our demand in this fossil fuel. Secondly, there are only three countries that will be strongly affected by low prices: Brazil, Mexico and Venezuela - mostly because of their short-sighted policy regarding savings from oil sales. Other big players of the oil-industry such as Russia or Middle East countries will be affected but not very strongly, because they have gained a lot from oil last years.
What are the effects?
The effects are obviously negative for the industry; however they are still good for the global economy. Why? In most countries of the world cheaper crude means cheaper gasoline. This trend will allow regular consumers to save a lot on fuel, and they will start to spend these savings on consumption of goods. Note, that winter holidays are coming and for most of us it is a signal to buy more, which we will definitely do. Besides, according to Business Insider companies from Standard & Poor's 500 index will benefit from low oil prices in 2015; so, $10 drop in Brent price will make these companies benefit from $2 to $145 per share. Also, here is an infographic based on Goldman and Sachs report that shows how other markets benefit from oil industry crisis.
What are the steps being taken to stop prices from falling?
The OPEC meeting was held on November the 27th where the members of the organization have decided not to cut production in order to bolster prices. The similar situation happened in the 1980’s; the only OPEC member that cut production that time was Saudi Arabia; now they are not going to do it alone so as to not lose their market share. “Saudi Arabia has definitely made it clear that defending the oil market is a collective responsibility, and no member country should expect Saudi Arabia to swing alone” - resolutely claimed the former aide to Saudi oil minister, Mr. Naimi. At the same time, other OPEC members such as Nigeria and Venezuela with weak economy will incur significant losses from production cut, so they also will not do it. So, the prices are set to fall.



















